2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep17786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying crustal thickness over time in magmatic arcs

Abstract: We present global and regional correlations between whole-rock values of Sr/Y and La/Yb and crustal thickness for intermediate rocks from modern subduction-related magmatic arcs formed around the Pacific. These correlations bolster earlier ideas that various geochemical parameters can be used to track changes of crustal thickness through time in ancient subduction systems. Inferred crustal thicknesses using our proposed empirical fits are consistent with independent geologic constraints for the Cenozoic evolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
271
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(55 reference statements)
10
271
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Crustal thickness with uncertainty is calculated following the method of Profeta et al . [] (see the supporting information). Note that the 122–82 Ma samples that are inferred to have originated from the subducting Neo‐Tethyan oceanic crust and some 35–9 Ma samples with high (La/Yb)n (>24) that are not constrained to a geophysically determined Moho depth [ Profeta et al ., ] are not used in the crustal thickness discussions.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crustal thickness with uncertainty is calculated following the method of Profeta et al . [] (see the supporting information). Note that the 122–82 Ma samples that are inferred to have originated from the subducting Neo‐Tethyan oceanic crust and some 35–9 Ma samples with high (La/Yb)n (>24) that are not constrained to a geophysically determined Moho depth [ Profeta et al ., ] are not used in the crustal thickness discussions.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Comparison between the compositions of recently emplaced intermediate continental calc‐alkaline magmatic rocks and geophysically determined crustal thickness, as well as studies from global correlations and specific orogens, show that geochemical indices can be used to track quantitatively temporal variations of crustal thickness in continental arcs [ Chiaradia , ; Chapman et al ., ; Profeta et al ., ]. An extended application of this approach in this paper to the Gangdese arc in southern Tibet (Figure a), and assuming Airy isostatic compensation, enables us to quantify the crustal thickness of the arc and reconstruct the spatial and temporal uplift history of the Gangdese Mountains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal thickness calculations based on the Sr/Y ratios (Chiaradia, 2015;Profeta et al, 2015) in the studied Jurassic plutons have yielded values between 3 and 38. This suggests a normal to relatively thin crust characterized by values between 25 km and 45 km, as has also been suggested by the subsiding nature of the Jurassic to Early Cretaceous basins (Sarmiento-Rojas et al, 2006).…”
Section: Cs Rb Ba Th U Nb K La Ce Pb Pr Sr P Nd Zr Sm Eu Ti Dy Y Yb Lumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical thickness of this box (and thus the overall crustal thickness) can be estimated by (a) examining geophysical data for recent comparable arc systems, (b) using geochemical proxies indicative of crustal thickness (e.g., Sr/Y ratios; Profeta et al, 2015), (c) simple geochemically constrained mass balance calculations (e.g., Jicha & Jagoutz, 2015), and/or (d) using isostatic mass balance modeling predicting crustal thicknesses (e.g., . These box thicknesses agree well with exposed crustal depths in each of the sections as constrained by geobarometry (see detailed description of areas and constraints on crustal depth in the supporting information).…”
Section: 1029/2018gc008031mentioning
confidence: 99%