2021
DOI: 10.1177/19322968211068445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Input Behaviors That Influence Clinical Outcomes in Diabetes and Other Chronic Illnesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are high rates of EPI in diabetes, and many people go undiagnosed for long periods, as is true with other common gastrointestinal conditions that are frequently present in people with diabetes. This is yet another indicator that glycemic outcomes may be influenced by variables outside of an individual’s control 5 and ability to self-manage (eg someone with EPI can’t make more enzymes), and points to the need for further study of many of these GI-related conditions and their impact on glycemic outcomes and GV. The use of AID and CGM should be funded and encouraged for studies in such related gastrointestinal conditions to fill the knowledge gaps about glycemic impacts of medications such as those used in PERT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are high rates of EPI in diabetes, and many people go undiagnosed for long periods, as is true with other common gastrointestinal conditions that are frequently present in people with diabetes. This is yet another indicator that glycemic outcomes may be influenced by variables outside of an individual’s control 5 and ability to self-manage (eg someone with EPI can’t make more enzymes), and points to the need for further study of many of these GI-related conditions and their impact on glycemic outcomes and GV. The use of AID and CGM should be funded and encouraged for studies in such related gastrointestinal conditions to fill the knowledge gaps about glycemic impacts of medications such as those used in PERT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 With the advent of new diabetes technologies including continuous glucose monitors (CGM), connected insulin pumps and insulin pens, and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, it is now possible to answer questions that have previously been left as gaps in the medical research. 5 PERT, in particular, may be well suited to study with an assessment of changes in post-meal glycemic variability (GV) in people with insulin-requiring diabetes. Alongside analyzing diabetes data and meal intake records from an individual with an open-source AID for a period of time both before and after using PERT, this article proposes a method for assessing GV and other related changes following the onset of new medication such as PERT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin pumps and CGM can be combined as part of an automated insulin delivery (AID) system, where data from each device flows through an algorithm to determine insulin-delivery rates and automatically adjust them to keep glucose values in a specific range, requiring less work from people with diabetes and also improving quality of life outcomes [ 1 ]. AID systems further generate rich data regarding the conditions (such as sensor glucose values, user-entered information such as targets or carbohydrates, and current and previous insulin delivery) in which it operates [ 2 ]. Exploring these rich data sources unveils opportunities for scientific discoveries to understand individual glucose outcomes better and improve diabetes technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing access to diabetes technology, we will increasingly move from guessing to choosing what manual behaviors a person with diabetes wants to do to achieve their goal outcomes, whether those be clinical outcomes, reducing effort, improving quality of life, or all three. 4 It is especially important to acknowledge the disparities, too, in who has access to tools that enable them to achieve their desired diabetes outcomes 5 and ensure that any individuals who do not have access to diabetes technology are not also stigmatized for that.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%