2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the influence of agricultural fires in northwest India on urban air pollution in Delhi, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FINN better resolves emissions from these small fires compared to some other fire emission data sets (Reddington et al, ). However, it is likely that emissions from agricultural fires are still underestimated in our study (Cusworth et al, ). Biomass burning emissions are largest in spring (MAM) and late autumn (ON), due to open crop residue burning postharvesting season, and smallest in the summer (JJA) (Venkataraman et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…FINN better resolves emissions from these small fires compared to some other fire emission data sets (Reddington et al, ). However, it is likely that emissions from agricultural fires are still underestimated in our study (Cusworth et al, ). Biomass burning emissions are largest in spring (MAM) and late autumn (ON), due to open crop residue burning postharvesting season, and smallest in the summer (JJA) (Venkataraman et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For high PM concentrations, anthropogenic sources like biomass burning products with downwind directions were reported as one of the principal contributors. Crop residue burning is identified and well documented as the primary cause of high PM 10 concentrations in the studied regions [51][52][53].…”
Section: Time Series Of Measured Pm 10 Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Biomass burning only plays a minor role in the CO enhancement: on average 1-2% at ground-level, and only 1% to the total column pollution level. In earlier studies, it was found that the GFAS biomass burning data, used in our analyses, likely underestimate the actual emissions of CO (Mota and Wooster, 2018;Cusworth et al, 2018;Huijnen et al, 2016). The comparison of TROPOMI data with our WRF simulations, based on MACCity and GFAS data, confirms that CO emissions are underestimated in the 11-14 20 November period.…”
Section: Meteorological Conditions 10mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are strong indications that GFAS might severely underestimate the fire emissions (Mota and Wooster, 2018). Cusworth et al (2018) concluded in their recent paper on biomass burning in India that the resolution of the MODIS satellite instrument, on which GFAS fire emissions are partly based, misses many small fires. In addition, thick smoke from fires might lead to an 10 underestimation of fire emissions from GFAS, as MODIS might identify these as clouds, as was found in a recent study over Indonesia (Huijnen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation