2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/3311912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Topographic Ruggedness Using Principal Component Analysis

Abstract: The development of geospatial technologies has opened a new era in terms of data collection techniques and analysis procedures. Digital elevation models as 3D visualization of the Earth’s surface have many mapping and spatial analysis applications. The primary terrain factors derived from the raster dataset are usually less critical than secondary ones, e.g., ruggedness index, which plays a vital role in engineering, hydrological information derivation, and geomorphological processes. Surface ruggedness is a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of a particular prediction model performance is a complex process (Habib, 2021a, b). In this study, the goodness-of-fit of the models to the dataset was assessed by computing the coefficient of determination, Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assessment of a particular prediction model performance is a complex process (Habib, 2021a, b). In this study, the goodness-of-fit of the models to the dataset was assessed by computing the coefficient of determination, Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2022) and the development of earth resource maps (Pourghasemi et al. , 2020; Habib, 2021a, b). Besides, several ANN models were created to evaluate slope stability (Sakellariou and Ferentinou, 2005; Wang et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These vectors are then decomposed into their x , y , and z components and used to calculate the VRM (c). Figure adapted from Sappington et al (2007) and Habib (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevation difference is first summed up and then multiplied or squared. The multiplied or squared value is squared again to get the final result TRI [25] . The equation is developed according to Fig.…”
Section: Topographic Roughness Index (Tri)mentioning
confidence: 99%