2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201961002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of pulmonary fungal burden in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis-infected mice by real-time PCR

Abstract: Although colony-forming unit (CFU) counting is widely used to quantify fungal load in tissue from animal experimentally infected with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, several technical disadvantages have been described. Here we developed highly accurate quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays to determine the relative P brasiliensis load in lungs from infected mice. SYBR Green- and TaqMan-based assays using primers and probe for the 43-kDa glycoprotein (gp43) gene detected as little as 270 gene copies (about 2 fg of DNA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assay was later used to detect Paracoccidioides DNA in tissue and peripheral blood of a patient that presented positive serology but negative culture [ 124 ]. Another interesting application of this technique was quantifying fungal load in experimentally infected mice [ 125 ]. Though promising, the method cannot differentiate between living and dead cells, which can be a problem [ 125 ].…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosis: Where Do We Stand?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assay was later used to detect Paracoccidioides DNA in tissue and peripheral blood of a patient that presented positive serology but negative culture [ 124 ]. Another interesting application of this technique was quantifying fungal load in experimentally infected mice [ 125 ]. Though promising, the method cannot differentiate between living and dead cells, which can be a problem [ 125 ].…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosis: Where Do We Stand?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting application of this technique was quantifying fungal load in experimentally infected mice [ 125 ]. Though promising, the method cannot differentiate between living and dead cells, which can be a problem [ 125 ].…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosis: Where Do We Stand?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For molecular detection of fungal pathogens, PCR is the most preferred method [215,216] and is regarded as a standard platform in many clinical laboratories, even in developing countries, due to its affordability and reproducibility [217,218]. RT-PCR assays with a short turnaround time can provide desirable alternatives for the rapid detection of microbes [210,219], and they are able to quantify the amount of amplified DNA in real time. Hence, conventional PCR methods have been replaced by RT-PCR techniques in medical laboratories [216].…”
Section: Molecular Methods Used To Detect Yeastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SYBR ® Green- and TaqMan-based assays using primers and probe for the 43-kDa glycoprotein (gp43) gene were able to detect as little as 270 gene copies (about 2 fg of DNA) per reaction. Although qPCR assays cannot distinguish between living and dead yeasts, it found a highly positive linear correlation between CFU and qPCR [219]. PCR and RT-PCR assays were also used to 100% identify 44 C. auris and related species, such as Candida duobushaemulonii , C. haemulonii , and C. lusitaniae with strong results [232].…”
Section: Molecular Methods Used To Detect Yeastsmentioning
confidence: 99%