2004
DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)018<0035:qaosvm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Single- vs. Multiple-Set Programs in Resistance Training

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the existing research on single-set vs. multiple-set resistance training programs. Using the meta-analytic approach, we included studies that met the following criteria in our analysis: (a) at least 6 subjects per group; (b) subject groups consisting of single-set vs. multiple-set resistance training programs; (c) pretest and posttest strength measures; (d) training programs of 6 weeks or more; (e) apparently "healthy" individuals free from orthopedic limitations; and (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
2
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
51
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our results showed positive effects with multiple sets, some previous studies have suggested that single and multiple sets promote similar gains in strength and muscle hypertrophy (Fleck and Kraemer 2004;Wolfe et al 2004). The effects of a number of sets has been investigated previously, whereas some original studies and a recent meta-analysis have asserted that multiple sets may promote greater strength and muscle hypertrophy gains (Krieger 2009(Krieger , 2010Paulsen et al 2003;Rhea et al 2002), other original studies found no significant difference between single and multiple sets (Hanssen et al 2013;Hass et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Although our results showed positive effects with multiple sets, some previous studies have suggested that single and multiple sets promote similar gains in strength and muscle hypertrophy (Fleck and Kraemer 2004;Wolfe et al 2004). The effects of a number of sets has been investigated previously, whereas some original studies and a recent meta-analysis have asserted that multiple sets may promote greater strength and muscle hypertrophy gains (Krieger 2009(Krieger , 2010Paulsen et al 2003;Rhea et al 2002), other original studies found no significant difference between single and multiple sets (Hanssen et al 2013;Hass et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Fleck e Kraemer (75) estabelecem que esse treinamento é o mais apropriado para indivíduos iniciantes em programas de musculação. Corroborando as citações anteriores, Wolfe et al (76) realizaram uma metanálise comparando as séries simples com as múltiplas em vários programas de treinamento, concluindo que, para os indivíduos sedentá-rios e iniciantes nesses programas, num período de seis a 16 semanas, o aumento da força via séries simples foi similar ao das múltiplas.…”
Section: ) Treinamento Concorrente Com Séries Simplesunclassified
“…Sabe-se, porém, que os efeitos promovidos pelo TCR dependem da manipulação de diversas variáveis (6,7) . Nesse sentido, é a combinação do número de repetições, séries, sobrecarga, intervalos, sequência dos exercícios e velocidade de execução dos movimentos que determina os ganhos de força (8,9) . Silva e Farinatti (10) , após revisão sistemática sobre os efeitos das variáveis de prescrição nas respostas ao TCR, identificaram lacunas importantes em relação à manipulação das variáveis de prescrição no que toca à estratégia mais eficiente para programas que visem o ganho de força em idosos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified