2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/qrs.2016.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Variation-Aware Internet of Things Designs Using Statistical Model Checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table summarizes the main characteristics of the design/analysis methods found in related bibliography and compares them with the BIP design flow of Figure . Most approaches are model‐based, but only the BIP flow and a few other works() are grounded on languages with formal semantics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table summarizes the main characteristics of the design/analysis methods found in related bibliography and compares them with the BIP design flow of Figure . Most approaches are model‐based, but only the BIP flow and a few other works() are grounded on languages with formal semantics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of quantitative specifications or the robustness analysis of systems is supported by some methods, but only the work of Cherrier et al and the BIP flow support the verification of qualitative properties, with the latter covering all categories. Moreover, most methods do not cover the entire design cycle (including code generation and deployment) with the notable exceptions of the works() and the BIP design flow. Some methods are limited to the analysis of WSN systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, most methods do not cover the entire design cycle (including code [139], [141], [143], [144] and the BIP design flow. Some methods are limited to the analysis of WSN systems.…”
Section: Comparison With Competitive Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the tools that support the various forms of analysis, most of the approaches in Table 5.5 provide or utilize various simulation frameworks with the notable exception of the BIP flow along with [140], [141], [143], [144], which support statistical model checking and/or other formal analyses. Finally, a noteworthy number of the shown methods aim to the generation of code for REST services running on the Contiki OS or other operating system.…”
Section: Comparison With Competitive Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%