1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(98)00052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of color image segmentation results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
163
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
163
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantitatively evaluate our experimental results, we used the function proposed in [40], which improved on the one proposed in Ref. [41].…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively evaluate our experimental results, we used the function proposed in [40], which improved on the one proposed in Ref. [41].…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] and the Q function proposed in Ref. [17]. These methods can be regarded as goodness methods, but they do not require any user-set parameter for the evaluation of the performance of the segmentation.…”
Section: Selected Evaluation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] and the Q function proposed in Ref. [17]. The first descriptor was introduced to evaluate the stability of a segmentation algorithm when minor shifts occur [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for an automatic selection of the optimal parameter values, the quality of segmentation must be also automatically evaluated. In literature, there are several quality segmentation criteria: Lui and Borsotti [13], classification rates and other statistical measures [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%