2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of Heterodera avenae females in soil and root extracts by digital image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a high correlation between the length of RKN measured by the manual method and that obtained using the machine method. The Naïve Bayes classifier and Linear Discriminant Analysis attained 96.1% and 93.5% accuracy, whereas the SG method achieved 97.3% [23]. Similarly, the detection rate was 87% in [19], whereas the proposed method outperformed it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was a high correlation between the length of RKN measured by the manual method and that obtained using the machine method. The Naïve Bayes classifier and Linear Discriminant Analysis attained 96.1% and 93.5% accuracy, whereas the SG method achieved 97.3% [23]. Similarly, the detection rate was 87% in [19], whereas the proposed method outperformed it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The one way-ANOVA test performed on count from CA, TS, and SG method found F-statistic = 4.440 and p-value = 0.004. In addition, three methods were investigated with ratio variation from [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The ratio between 10-35 was found to have the lowest number of misidentified and missed RKN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure, also called rotation estimation (Picard and Cook 1984;Kohavi 1995), was applied, both to evaluate the performance and to validate any classifier. The validation procedure used here is the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) (Grillo et al 2016). It involves using a single case from the original sample set as the validation dataset and the remaining cases as the training set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been developed to identify nematodes including morphology, molecular and differential host test [17]. RKN infestation can be determined based on the number of eggs in the roots [18,19], juvenile populations in the soil [20,21], the number of adult females in the roots [22,23], and root gall index and reproduction factor [24]. The number of egg mass and gall rating are also used for nematode infestation [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%