2008
DOI: 10.1109/memb.2008.919494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For fall-risk assessment, an instrumented TUG test that uses portable inertial sensors (iTUG test) has been proposed to improve the TUG test in several ways; namely, by allowing for automatic detection and separation of each performance, facilitating a detailed analysis of each and enabling a higher sensitivity than the TUG test [21,[24][25][26]. Sensitive and reliable measures for fall-risk assessment have been provided by measurement of wearable inertial sensors [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For fall-risk assessment, an instrumented TUG test that uses portable inertial sensors (iTUG test) has been proposed to improve the TUG test in several ways; namely, by allowing for automatic detection and separation of each performance, facilitating a detailed analysis of each and enabling a higher sensitivity than the TUG test [21,[24][25][26]. Sensitive and reliable measures for fall-risk assessment have been provided by measurement of wearable inertial sensors [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study showed that frail elderly subjects exhibited significantly decreased smoothness in the sit-stand transition pattern [8,21,23,[29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies use wearable inertial sensors to detect the phases in TUG test by using the Euler angles or angular velocity signals that had been processed by filters [25], [26]. Some specific algorithms used to filter out the noise of the sensors for the detection are presented in [27], [46].…”
Section: Detection Of Distinct Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback of most studies is that these measures are obtained on a reduced space with specialized laboratory equipment such as motion capture systems and instrumented walkways, which may not be available in many clinics and certainly not during daily activities. Thus the recent studies used the wearable inertial sensors to analyze the fall risk of elderly people [25], [26], [27]. Thanks to encoders and a 3D accelerometer/gyrometer, by using the smart walker we can not only calculate accurately all the classical gait parameters proposed above, but also avoid imposing constraints on the end-users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%