2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002590100511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of skeletal tumours with dynamic FDG PET: SUV in comparison to Patlak analysis

Abstract: This study was carried out to evaluate bone lesions using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and to explore whether dynamic and quantitative PET data may help to differentiate benign lesions from malignant masses. Forty patients with primary bone lesions were studied. The final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. A 60-min dynamic FDG PET acquisition was undertaken in all subjects. From the dynamic PET images, indices such as the average and maximal standardised uptake … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather it was to assess whether differences between the two methods occur, and to gain insight into the reasons behind those differences. This information would permit a better understanding of recent [12,13] and future data assessing the relative clinical efficacy of the two methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rather it was to assess whether differences between the two methods occur, and to gain insight into the reasons behind those differences. This information would permit a better understanding of recent [12,13] and future data assessing the relative clinical efficacy of the two methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is uniquely suited for evaluating metabolic activity in human tumors for 1 3 diagnostic imaging purposes [1]. The glucose analog 2-[ 18 F]fl uoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has proved to be successful as a PET imaging agent in detecting and localizing many types of tumor cells and shows enhanced uptake of 18 F-FDG in malignant tumors relative to benign ones [2,3]. However, there is controversy about the ability of 18 F-FDG-PET to differentiate between malignant and benign musculoskeletal tumors because some benign tumors show as high 18 F-FDG uptake as malignant tumors (false positive) and some malignant tumors show low uptake (false negative) [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a range of t > 3 min was used in the nPGA method presented in this paper. The PGA method is often compared with the use of the standard uptake value (SUV), a popular semi-quantitative index for the analysis of PET images in cancer diagnosis [26,27]. A comparison between the SUV and nPGA methods will be investigated in the future studies as well as the investigation in non-invasive tumor quantification of human by using nPGA method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%