2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry profiling of activated methyl cycle metabolites involved in LuxS-dependent quorum sensing in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SAH is present at ϳ1 M in wild-type E. coli and 50 M in a mutant strain without MTAN (43). Together, these data suggest SAH could have a physiologically relevant role in regulating ThiC activity under conditions where MTAN activity is reduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SAH is present at ϳ1 M in wild-type E. coli and 50 M in a mutant strain without MTAN (43). Together, these data suggest SAH could have a physiologically relevant role in regulating ThiC activity under conditions where MTAN activity is reduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Under normal metabolic conditions, product inhibition would be expected to be minimal. Met concentrations are estimated at 150 -300 M (43,44), and MTAN is present to rapidly hydrolyze low levels of 5Ј-DOA produced. However, these constants suggest that product inhibition could be significant in in vitro assays, including those reported here.…”
Section: ј-Deoxyadenosine and Methionine Cooperatively Inhibitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sgm complex with SAM has a K d of 18 mM (Husain et al 2010), the K d of the RsmC complex with SAM is 5 mM (Sunita et al 2007), and the K d of the RlmI complex with SAM is 3 mM (Sunita et al 2008). This difference might not be very essential for functioning of methyltransferases in vitro, since the intracellular concentration of SAM-400 mM (Halliday et al 2010)-is much greater than the K d for all of these enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SAM binding was shown to be tightest, with K d = 0.58 mM, while SAH binds four times less tightly, with K d = 2.5 mM. Abundance of SAM in E. coli was estimated to be 400 mM, while that of SAH was 1.3 mM (Halliday et al 2010). Such a difference in binding and metabolite abundance ensures a rapid exchange of SAH to SAM following 30S methylation.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Characteristics Of Rsmd Binding To Sam Sah Amentioning
confidence: 94%
“…AMC is an important metabolic pathway for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. It is responsible for the recycling of sulfur-containing amino acids such as cysteine and homocysteine [Halliday et al, 2010]. S-adenosylmethionine synthase (MetK) converts the abovementioned amino acids to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which provides a methyl group for methylation of the proteins, RNA, and DNA.…”
Section: Production Of Signal Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%