2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative theory of driven nonlinear brain dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
116
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
13
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering individual differences, the bifurcation points in the human proprioceptive system could vary between subjects, which could explain why subharmonic coupling was not shown in all subjects. Similar to the previous findings in the human visual system [3,7], 1:2 subharmonic coupling was the most common subharmonic coupling. In this study, we did not find 2:3 subharmonic coupling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Considering individual differences, the bifurcation points in the human proprioceptive system could vary between subjects, which could explain why subharmonic coupling was not shown in all subjects. Similar to the previous findings in the human visual system [3,7], 1:2 subharmonic coupling was the most common subharmonic coupling. In this study, we did not find 2:3 subharmonic coupling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…visual flickering) has often been reported in the human visual system [3,7]. Most studies using somatosensory stimuli, mainly using tactile stimuli,) only reported harmonic and intermodulation coupling (see [8,10,14,36,41] for examples and a brief review is available in [42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations