2000 Symposium on VLSI Technology. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.00CH37104)
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2000.852784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative yield and reliability projection from antenna test results-a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AR eff = area of interconnect / area of thinned spot (3) As an illustration of the weakness of the AR definition in equation (1) it is assumed that eg. a large MOS device of 500µm 2 even with a very small polysilicon antenna can cause a worst case scenario regarding PID.…”
Section: Definition Of Antenna Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AR eff = area of interconnect / area of thinned spot (3) As an illustration of the weakness of the AR definition in equation (1) it is assumed that eg. a large MOS device of 500µm 2 even with a very small polysilicon antenna can cause a worst case scenario regarding PID.…”
Section: Definition Of Antenna Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of literature [3,4,[6][7][8][9][10]18] has been published on the subjects: characterisation and assessment of PID. It is well documented that PID stress measurements have different sensitivities to PMOS and NMOS and thin and thick MOS oxides.…”
Section: Characterisation and Assessment Of Pidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ion current (I ion ) is almost constant during the entire period determined by an rf cycle, whereas electron current (I e ) exhibits characteristics varying with time. 15,30,42) Over the whole period of the rf cycle, the charges of ions impacting on a device are cancelled owing to the charge neutrality of plasma. Thus, the plasma charging current (I p ) through the device with an antenna ratio r is described by…”
Section: Plasma-induced Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this charging damage is considered to be inevitable in present-day plasma equipment, the antenna design rules that limit the maximum r in circuits and the protection diode scheme have been introduced to minimize this damage. 28,29) It is widely believed that plasma charging current is determined by plasma parameters (plasma density and electron temperature 30) ) and the device layout design (antenna ratio and antenna aspect ratio): thus, one should consider the V th variations induced by the charging damage. Although various protection diodes are proposed and introduced into the circuit, the ability to suppress the charging damage is believed to be structure-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%