1991
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199110000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantity of Protein Deposited on Hydrogel Contact Lenses and Its Relation to Visible Protein Deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the application of hydrogel as intraocular lenses, too high hydrophilicity of hydrogel facilitates the adsorption and deposition of protein and Ca 2þ to the lens materials, which is the major cause for the turbidness even opacity of artificial lenses. 36 Thus, adjusting the degree of hydrophilicity for materials is very useful in practical applications. As seen from the curves of CA versus the wetting time (Fig.…”
Section: Wetting Property Of Pegda Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the application of hydrogel as intraocular lenses, too high hydrophilicity of hydrogel facilitates the adsorption and deposition of protein and Ca 2þ to the lens materials, which is the major cause for the turbidness even opacity of artificial lenses. 36 Thus, adjusting the degree of hydrophilicity for materials is very useful in practical applications. As seen from the curves of CA versus the wetting time (Fig.…”
Section: Wetting Property Of Pegda Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protein films are comprised of several different proteins, with lysozyme being a major constituent. Numerous methods have been developed to evaluate and measure these deposits, including: Rudko (1,2,3), image analysis (2), protein assays (3, 4-6, 8, 16), microscopy (4,14,15,19), UV spectrophotometry (7,8,16), HPLC (9,10), FTIR-ATR (11,17), SDS-PAGE (12-14, 16, 18), fluorescence (14,15,20), and amino acid analyses (16,17). Visual methods such as Rudko, microscopy, and image analysis offer a semi-quantitative way of evaluating deposits but are limited to surface deposits and, particularly with Rudko, are subjective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the protein study (1), we found that the high water content, ionic matrix (group IV) lenses are most prone to developing protein deposits, a result obtained by other groups using various procedures (2)(3)(4). In the lipid study (5), we found that nonionic polymer matrices and higher water content (group II) lenses were most prone to lipid deposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%