Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity
DOI: 10.1109/ccc.2001.933881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum versus classical learnability

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(129 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This separation between quantum and classical learning is far more robust than previous work [26]. Even if a polynomial-time classical factoring algorithm were to be discovered, our separation would hold as long as any one-way function exists (a universally held belief in public-key cryptography).…”
Section: ¡ Which Is Polynomial-time Learnable From Quantum Membershipmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This separation between quantum and classical learning is far more robust than previous work [26]. Even if a polynomial-time classical factoring algorithm were to be discovered, our separation would hold as long as any one-way function exists (a universally held belief in public-key cryptography).…”
Section: ¡ Which Is Polynomial-time Learnable From Quantum Membershipmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In contrast with the work described above, the goal here is to exactly identify the black-box function rather than to determine whether or not it has some property. Servedio and Gortler [26] defined such a model and proved that any concept class ¡ which is information-theoretically learnable from polynomially many quantum membership queries is also informationtheoretically learnable from polynomially many classical membership queries (they also gave a similar result for the quantum PAC learning model of [10]). …”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations