2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/18/185601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quarter-filled supersolid and solid phases in the extended Bose–Hubbard model

Abstract: We numerically study the ground state phase diagram of the two-dimensional hard-core Bose-Hubbard model with nearest-(V(1)) and next-nearest-neighbour (V(2)) repulsions. In particular, we focus on the quarter-filled phases where one supersolid and two solid phases are observed. Using both canonical and grand canonical quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods and a mean-field calculation, we provide evidence for the existence of a commensurate supersolid. Despite the two possible diagonal long-range orderings for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 of Ref. 7. This indicates that the neglected quantum fluctuations in the mean-field calculations destabilize the supersolid phases and reduce the region of the supersolid phases in the ground-state phase diagram.…”
Section: Ground-state Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 of Ref. 7. This indicates that the neglected quantum fluctuations in the mean-field calculations destabilize the supersolid phases and reduce the region of the supersolid phases in the ground-state phase diagram.…”
Section: Ground-state Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The ground-state phase diagrams V 1 vs V 2 at quarter filling have been presented before 5,7 . The star supersolid is found to be stable for a wide region of parameters V 1 and V 2 even at commensurate filling n = 1/4.…”
Section: Ground-state Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b . The supersolid has a non-vanishing superfluid order parameter combined with a density wave representing diagonal order 19 28 29 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 ( Fig. 1g ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For weak interactions the ground state is a superfluid phase (SF), whereas for strong interactions a localization of the particles is favored forming the Mott insulator phase (MI) 14 15 16 . Theoretically, extended Bose—Hubbard models with off-site interactions 17 have been studied predicting pair superfluid phases 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 , charge-density-wave insulators 19 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 and supersolid phases 19 28 29 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 . The latter two phases exhibit a density modulation with respect to neighboring lattice sites and break the inversion symmetry of the lattice Hamiltonian spontaneously in the thermodynamic limit 26 27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other phases with more complex symmetries, such as three-sublattice and four-sublattice phases, are affected more strongly by the quantum fluctuations, and the locations are shifted towards the region of much smaller values of J/J c than those of the MF theory. 18,57 Thus, we leave them out of the scope of the rest of this paper, treating only a relatively large-J/J c region.…”
Section: B the Cmf Results For The 4 × 4 Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%