1994
DOI: 10.2307/2290852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-likelihood Estimation in Semiparametric Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…confounders) are nuisance parameters. Efficient estimation for partially linear models has been extensively studied and well understood for independent data; see, for example, Chen (1988),Speckman (1988) and Severini & Staniswalis (1994). Martinussen et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…confounders) are nuisance parameters. Efficient estimation for partially linear models has been extensively studied and well understood for independent data; see, for example, Chen (1988),Speckman (1988) and Severini & Staniswalis (1994). Martinussen et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic model is that, for a known function μ (·) and a true but unknown function θ 0 ( z ), where, given , has mean 0 and covariance matrix Σ( τ 0 ) for a parameter τ 0 . Note that the function θ 0 (·) is evaluated repeatedly, and thus this problem is very much different from the standard partially linear model (Severini and Staniswalis, 1994). This problem has a large literature, with many kernel‐based methods (Zeger and Diggle (1994), Hoover et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that a similar non‐parametric function in a generalised linear model context was studied by Severini & Staniswalis () and Lin & Carroll () using the so‐called GEE (generalised estimating equation) approach, which has, however, several drawbacks as discussed by Sutradhar, Warriyar & Zheng () for count data.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Note that the unconditional mean μ ij ( β , θ , σ τ , ψ (·)) can be computed in practice using the approachμijfalse(bold-italicβ,θ,στ,ψ(·)false)1Nfalse∑w=1Nμij*false(bold-italicβ,θ,στ,ψ(·)false|τitaliciwfalse),where N is a large number such as N = 1000, and τ iw , w = 1, …, N , is a random sample from a standard normal distribution. Notice that the recursive nature of formula implies that the unconditional mean μ ij ( β , θ , σ τ , ψ (·)) in or depends not only on the present covariate values ( x ij , z ij ), but also on the past covariate values from ( x i , j −1 , z i , j −1 ) to ( x i 1 , z i 1 ), which is a major difference between the SBDML model and the semi‐parametric fixed models studied by other authors such as Severini & Staniswalis (), and Lin & Carroll ().…”
Section: Proposed Sbdml Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%