2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static crushing behavior of novel re-entrant circular auxetic honeycombs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2020, Wu et al found that an increase in the cell wall angle and cell wall thickness of re-entrant honeycomb mechanical metamaterials improved their energy absorption capacity. This agreed with the reports of Zhang et al and Wang et al Qi et al fabricated a doubly circular arc slope cell wall re-entrant honeycomb structure, which resulted in improved energy adsorption and a significant NPR effect compared to those of a regular honeycomb structure.…”
Section: Auxetic Polymer-based Mechanical Metamaterialssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In 2020, Wu et al found that an increase in the cell wall angle and cell wall thickness of re-entrant honeycomb mechanical metamaterials improved their energy absorption capacity. This agreed with the reports of Zhang et al and Wang et al Qi et al fabricated a doubly circular arc slope cell wall re-entrant honeycomb structure, which resulted in improved energy adsorption and a significant NPR effect compared to those of a regular honeycomb structure.…”
Section: Auxetic Polymer-based Mechanical Metamaterialssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Realizing architected honeycombs via material jetting additive manufacturing, their study demonstrated that such geometrically tailored designs exhibit energy absorption efficiency as high as 90%. It can be concluded from the above studies that mechanical/energy absorption properties of auxetic honeycombs are primarily governed by their unit-cell architectures [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this paper, the compression speed is set as 0.5 m/s according to other references. [31][32][33] The experiment outcomes are compared with the finite element simulation results. The maximum compression displacement is 60 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%