2000
DOI: 10.2307/3455858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quince años de legislación democrática sobre temas militares y de defensa (1983-1998)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In violation of this traditional division of tasks, the Gendarmerie extended its jurisdiction to internal affairs and received an increasing budget during the last Argentinean civil-military dictatorship (Hathazy 2016: 79). The first democratic government after the civil-military regime abandoned the dictatorship's National Security Doctrine and passed laws 1 to reimpose strict distinctions between the military and police forces; this was the main concern of the democratic transition IJCJ&SD 44 Online version via www.crimejusticejournal.com © 2019 8(3) (Muzzopappa 2017;Sain 2000;Andersen 2002: 80). However, since the 1990s, the Gendarmerie was called on to provide security to Jewish establishments (Hathazy 2013: 36; Nieves and Bonavena 2014), participate in forensic examinations (Escolar 2017a), support the police in ordinary crime prevention (Nieves and Bonavena 2014) and suppress social protests (Escolar 2017a: 47).…”
Section: Indigenous As Terrorists As the Last Argument To Support Crimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In violation of this traditional division of tasks, the Gendarmerie extended its jurisdiction to internal affairs and received an increasing budget during the last Argentinean civil-military dictatorship (Hathazy 2016: 79). The first democratic government after the civil-military regime abandoned the dictatorship's National Security Doctrine and passed laws 1 to reimpose strict distinctions between the military and police forces; this was the main concern of the democratic transition IJCJ&SD 44 Online version via www.crimejusticejournal.com © 2019 8(3) (Muzzopappa 2017;Sain 2000;Andersen 2002: 80). However, since the 1990s, the Gendarmerie was called on to provide security to Jewish establishments (Hathazy 2013: 36; Nieves and Bonavena 2014), participate in forensic examinations (Escolar 2017a), support the police in ordinary crime prevention (Nieves and Bonavena 2014) and suppress social protests (Escolar 2017a: 47).…”
Section: Indigenous As Terrorists As the Last Argument To Support Crimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently of the discussions regarding the success of reforms of civil-military relations in Argentina since the return of democracy, experts agree that the country succeeded in crafting a set of norms and policies that has set the tone for national defense for almost thirty years. Some have called it "a basic consensus on the defense realm" (SAI N, 2000), "an agreement over the fundamentals" (TOKATLIA N, 2016), an even a "true state policy" (ANZELINI, 2016). One of the most praised features of these policies is that they were the result of a bipartisan consensus reached in congress in the 1980s between part of the governing Unión Cıvica Radical and a wing of the Partido Justicialista, known as Peronismo Renovador.…”
Section: Linking Democracy With the Separation Between Defense And Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, facilitaron lo que Marcelo Saín (2000) ha denominado "consenso básico", a través del cual el país abandonó la doctrina de la seguridad nacional y produjo legislación que estableció la separación entre seguridad interior y defensa.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified