Grammatik Im Gespräch 2009
DOI: 10.1515/9783110213638.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quotativ-Konstruktionen mit Motto als Ressourcen für Selbst- und Fremdpositionierungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Motto" (Bücker 2009) in German or "van" (Mazeland 2006) in Dutch. 10 Some of these studies offer important new insights into language change processes which are different from grammaticalization as described by Lehmann (1995) and others (cf.…”
Section: Direct Speech As a Narrative Actmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motto" (Bücker 2009) in German or "van" (Mazeland 2006) in Dutch. 10 Some of these studies offer important new insights into language change processes which are different from grammaticalization as described by Lehmann (1995) and others (cf.…”
Section: Direct Speech As a Narrative Actmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntactically, both speakers employ non-canonical linguistic resources to accomplish their current interactional business: In the "lottery jackpot" example, Christoph uses "von wegen" as a part of the reporting frame (cf. Bücker 2008) while in the "academic studies" example, Stefanie is initiating direct speech by means of "nach dem Motto" (see Bücker 2009). Both reporting frames have advantages over their common written counterparts (especially clauses with verbs of saying or thinking) due to the medial characteristics of spoken conversation (ephemerality, linearity, dialogicality):…”
Section: "Von Wegen" and "Nach Dem Motto" As Flexible And Ekphrastic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mit tying is not a canonical symbolic part of the propositional content of the subsequent, preceding or host turn-constructional unit but rather an index (or topical keyword) mit tying + NP does not have a phrasal or a clausal scope but is a pragmatic operator with a pragmatically driven (and hence potentially far-reaching) scope -Retrospective: The complement of mit tying points (back) to a topical antecedent which is considered to be intersubjectively accessible -Prospective: mit tying + NP establishes the topical antecedent as an explicated topical presupposition of local speech acts in order to restrict their possible readings 22 See Birkner (2006), Imo (2007), Günthner (2009) and Bücker (2009) with regard to further examples of constructions which have not been discussed as entrenched form-meaning pairings before.…”
Section: Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bücker (2009) nennt Konstruktionen wie nach dem Motto "Quotativ-Konstruktionen". Der Gebrauch von it's like oder it/I was like in dieser und ähnlichen Sequenzen dieses Gesprächs ist mit nach dem Motto vergleichbar: Bücker zeigt, dass die Funktion solcher Idiome in der Einführung narrativer Rekonstruktionen liegt, ohne dass dabei etwas tatsächlich Gesagtes zitiert würde.…”
unclassified