2016
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Metabolomics: Current Status and Future Directions

Abstract: Human exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) disrupts normal metabolic processes in cells and organs by inducing complex biological responses that interfere with gene and protein expression. Conventional dosimetry, monitoring of prodromal symptoms, and peripheral lymphocyte counts are of limited value as organ- and tissue-specific biomarkers for personnel exposed to radiation, particularly, weeks or months after exposure. Analysis of metabolites generated in known stress-responsive pathways by molecular profiling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common circulating markers of cardiac injury from various causes, such as troponins, atrial natriuretic peptide, and brain natriuretic peptide have been tested as early identifiers of cardiac radiation injury in patients, with varying results [125131]. Studies are increasingly focused on finding molecular markers that can specifically indicate radiation injury [132], and new sensitive high-throughput technologies prove to be useful [133]. The goal of these studies is to identify biomarkers that can distinguish cardiovascular radiation toxicity from cardiovascular disease due to other causes.…”
Section: Detection Of Radiation-induced Heart Disease and Non-invamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common circulating markers of cardiac injury from various causes, such as troponins, atrial natriuretic peptide, and brain natriuretic peptide have been tested as early identifiers of cardiac radiation injury in patients, with varying results [125131]. Studies are increasingly focused on finding molecular markers that can specifically indicate radiation injury [132], and new sensitive high-throughput technologies prove to be useful [133]. The goal of these studies is to identify biomarkers that can distinguish cardiovascular radiation toxicity from cardiovascular disease due to other causes.…”
Section: Detection Of Radiation-induced Heart Disease and Non-invamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple reviews have detailed the technological aspects of radiation biodosimetry (Patterson et al, 2010, Coy et al, 2011, Di Girolamo et al, 2013, Menon et al, 2016), while others have focused on the strengths and challenges of this newer –omics field (Johnson and Gonzalez, 2012, Patti et al., 2012). Briefly, nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H-NMR or NMR) had been the platform of choice historically, with samples analyzed in a non-destructive manner and because it provided information on the structure of a given biomarker (Menon et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H-NMR or NMR) had been the platform of choice historically, with samples analyzed in a non-destructive manner and because it provided information on the structure of a given biomarker (Menon et al, 2016). However, the tendency of NMR to identify high abundance molecules due to low sensitivity, left many metabolites undiscovered that could serve as biomarkers of a given injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, we have explored the value of such markers in rodents, nonhuman primates, and total-body-irradiated humans with very encouraging results and significant cross-species validation (48). In this pilot study, we extended our studies to assess the utility of saliva as a biofluid for biodosimetry through metabolomics at day 1 and 7 postirradiation, time points that have been previously investigated with other biofluids (1, 4, 6, 7, 911). Since the salivary glands as well as oral mucosa are highly radiosensitive, this can be translated in products of radiation exposure directly present in saliva from cells undergoing cell death (12, 13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%