2006
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical HRM innovation and competitive advantage: TheMoneyball story

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
112
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Further support for our manager estimates comes from the fact that the top managers we identify are consistent with other research and popular opinion on baseball manager abilities. For example, in the case of GMs we find support for the notion that the 'moneyball' managers (see Lewis, 2003) have outperformed their peers, as also argued by Hakes and Sauer (2006) and Wolfe et al (2006). Our results in this respect diverge however from Goff (2013), which we suspect is due to large differences both in inputs and methodology.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…5 Further support for our manager estimates comes from the fact that the top managers we identify are consistent with other research and popular opinion on baseball manager abilities. For example, in the case of GMs we find support for the notion that the 'moneyball' managers (see Lewis, 2003) have outperformed their peers, as also argued by Hakes and Sauer (2006) and Wolfe et al (2006). Our results in this respect diverge however from Goff (2013), which we suspect is due to large differences both in inputs and methodology.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Le rôle premier de ces organisations est de faire respecter les règles du jeu des disciplines sportives qu'elles promeuvent au sein de leur pays, de les faire connaître et de les représenter ainsi que ceux qui y participent (Comité de gestion du sport, 2001 ;Papadimitriou et Taylor, 2000). Elles sont aujourd'hui encouragées à satisfaire les attentes de leurs parties prenantes (e.g., adhérents, pouvoirs publics, sponsors) en développant de nouveaux services (Lee, Ginn et Naylor, 2009 (Caza, 2000 ;Franke et Shah, 2003 ;Gilmore et Gilson, 2007;Hoeber et Hoeber, 2012 ;Newell et Swan, 1995 ;Wolfe, Wright et Smart, 2006). Pourtant, il est crucial, dans un environnement changeant, de mieux comprendre les processus selon lesquels les organisations sportives évoluent, notamment en innovant.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Thus, managers of innovation processes require a tacit understanding of why constituents develop positive or negative attitudes to new devices in order to mitigate against resistance. While constituent perceptions do not necessarily correlate with the objective merit of an innovation (Wolfe, Wright, & Smart, 2006); they provide a crucial insight into potential issues that may emerge at the point of implementation.…”
Section: Technological Innovation In Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hogg & Smith, 2007;Tajfel & Turner, 1979). The threat to creativity and individuality led to perceptions that the proposed innovation would create a radical change from the status quo (Wolfe et al, 2006;Wolfe, 1995). Coach 1 stated, 'I believe this has no place in judging', while Coach 19 explained that "You start narrowing the sport and the freedom of the sport and that's the disadvantage.…”
Section: Interpreting Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%