Raising voice: Effect of psychological contract breach on employee voice through organizational cynicism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the importance of the roles of psychological contract and voice in organizational life, this study highlights the effect of contract breach on managers and their voice directed at top management members, key representatives of the organization. OBJECTIVE: Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines the relationship between a psychological contract breach (PCB) and concurrent organizational cynicism resulting in a considerate and aggressive managerial voice behavior. METHODS: Data came from an online survey on PCB and subsequent behaviors from a sample of 336 in-company European and Asian employees with managerial responsibilities working in France. RESULTS: The results provide partial support for the hypothesized relationships and show the consequences of the bi-dimensionality of aggressive voice behavior (fight and negativity). Moreover, organizational cynicism mediates the relationship between PCB and the negativity dimension of aggressive voice. However, data analysis shows no support for organizational cynicism’s mediating role in the relationship between PCB and considerate voice. CONCLUSIONS: The study results of 336 in-company European and Asian employees having a managerial position, like project managers, middle managers, executives, employs a great insight into managerial voice behavior. This study contributes to the limited research conducted on the managerial voice in response to PCB. The findings have important implications for employers to understand managers’ psychological contracts and related voice behavior.

Role of authentic leadership in enhancing employees' voice behavior through psychological capital during COVID-19 pandemic

“…turnover intention and cynicism) (Avey et al, 2011) and develop organizational citizenship behavior (Norman et al, 2010). The research has considered VB as a different kind of organizational citizenship behavior (Afshan et al, 2021;Chou and Barron, 2016) because this behavior is often perceived detrimental and challenging for the employees in the organization (Liu et al, 2010).…”

Employee Constructive Voice: An Integrative Review and a Dyadic Approach

“…As a result, voicers may come to believe that they are unlikely to reap the benefits of voice even if their manager endorses and/or implements it, which increases the perceived risk of initiating voice. Consequently, employees who experience psychological contract breach are less likely to engage in constructive voice (Afshan, Serrano-Archimi, & Lacroux, 2021;Guo, 2017;Memon & Ghani, 2020;Ng, Feldman, & Butts, 2014;Turnley & Feldman, 1999). Similarly, psychologically detached employees are unlikely to value, and are unmotivated to initiate, a social exchange relationship with their managers (Griffeth et al, 2000;Kahn, 1990;Tett & Meyer, 1993), which prevents them from speaking up (Burris et al, 2008).…”

It’s not justice if it’s not for all: cross-level interaction of interactional justice differentiation and supervisory justice on psychological safety and conflict

“…First , supervisors’ attitudes and actions form individuals’ perceptions (Afshan et al , 2020; Su et al , 2020). The supervisors manifest justice through interactions (interactional justice) (Bies, 2001; Bies and Moag, 1986; Greenberg, 1993), fair procedures (procedural justice) and distributed outcomes (distributive justice) (Cohen-Charash and Spector, 2001; Thibaut and Walker, 1975).…”