Disclosure: R.G.-J. has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards and has been supported in attending international meetings by Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Roche. He has also received unrestricted grants for research from Merck, SanofiAventis, and Roche. M.H. has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards and has been supported in attending international meetings by Merck, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Roche.
LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Interpret the results of the relevant randomized trials of neoadjuvant induction chemoradiation from Europe and the U.S.2. Explain why induction chemoradiation is preferred over postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation.3. Discuss the rationale for using neoadjuvant induction chemoradiation in rectal cancer.Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit ™ at CME.TheOncologist.com CME CME Conclusions. CRT in the European randomized trials of rectal cancer improves tumor downstaging, pathological complete response, and local control over radiotherapy alone, but does not translate into a benefit in terms of longer DFS or OS, or a higher chance of sphincter preservation. Metastatic disease remains a significant problem, which provides a strong rationale for the integration of a second cytotoxic drug, or biologically targeted agents. The
ABSTRACT