2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett's neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
112
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EMR is considered a relatively safe technique, with complications including bleeding (10%) (24,26), perforation (3%) (24,26) and stricture formation. The risk of stricture formation is proportionate to the size and circumference of the lesion, with up to a 37% risk.…”
Section: Section B: Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMR is considered a relatively safe technique, with complications including bleeding (10%) (24,26), perforation (3%) (24,26) and stricture formation. The risk of stricture formation is proportionate to the size and circumference of the lesion, with up to a 37% risk.…”
Section: Section B: Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-band mucosectomy (MBM) is a variation of the band ligator technique which uses a specialized banding device that contains multiple bands and allows passage of a snare through the banding cap so that multiple resections can be performed in quick succession. MBM has been shown to be quicker and less expensive than the cap technique, with comparable safety and efficacy (64). An analysis of 1,000 patients with intramucosal EAC treated with EMR reported a complete response in 96.3% of patients after a median follow up period of 5 years (65).…”
Section: Ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized trial comparing cap-assisted with ligation-assisted EMR for the resection of Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia demonstrated that ligation-assisted EMR was significantly faster than cap-assisted EMR with median procedures times of 34 and 50 min, respectively (p = 0.02), with no differences in rates of adverse events or quality of the resection specimens [53].…”
Section: Barrett's Esophagusmentioning
confidence: 99%