Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview

Abstract

SummaryMulticriteria decision making (MCDM) refers to screening, prioritizing, ranking or selecting the alternatives based on human judgment from among a finite set of ` alternatives in terms of the multiple usually conflicting criteria. A very significant role in MCDM models plays the weights of criteria which usually provide the information about the relative importance of the considered criteria. Several different methods are developed to take criteria priorities into account.The aim of the paper is a comparative overview on several rank ordering weights methods which are considered to convert the ordinal ranking of a number of criteria into numerical weights. Using ranks to elicit weights by some formulas is more reliable than just directly assigning weights to criteria because usually decision makers are more confident about the ranks of some criteria than their weights, and they can agree on ranks more easily. The great advantage of those methods is the fact that they rely only on ordinal information about attribute importance. They can be used for instance in situations of time pressure, quality nature of criteria, lack of knowledge, imprecise, incomplete information or partial information, decision maker's limited attention and information processing capability. The equal weights, rank sum, rank exponent, rank reciprocal as well centroid weights technique are presented. These methods have been selected for their simplicity and effectiveness.

Application of MADM Methods for Selecting the Best Private Institution for Professional Courses in Uttarakhand State, India

“…Implementation of different MADM methodologies Weights, which are determined based on preference factor among the attributes. Direct Weight Elicitation Technique and Rank-Order Centroid method [6] are used to assign the weights. The weights in this study have been assigned using the following equation…”

Assessing the likelihood of achieving prototyping benefits in systems acquisition

“…One of the main advantages of ranking weight methods is their simple reliance on ordinal information to describe criteria importance (Roszkowska, 2013). For this research, the purpose of the ranking is twofold: (a) to determine which benefits and factors are most important for prototyping success, and (b) to determine, for each, the weight of its contribution to prototyping success, which is then used to calculate the overall likelihood of success.…”

“…Because weights were not elicited from survey participants, the indirect explication method of weighting by ranking is chosen due to its simplicity and because its explanatory power remains high when there are a relatively small number of criteria. Roszkowska (2013) states: "Generally, the ranking method of weight determination involves two steps: ranking the criteria according to their importance, and weighting the criteria from their ranks using one of the rank-order weighting formula" (p. 15). Rankings were in ascending order: The most important factor was given rank 1, the second most important factor given rank 2, and the least important factor given rank n. To avoid assigning arbitrary weights and to compare and verify weighting results, several weighting methods are used.…”

An Analysis of the Decisive Criteria in Formwork Selection Problem

“…Criteria weight ordering always pays a key role in the multi-criteria decision analysis, regardless of the decision-supporting method, and was a subject of research carried out by Stillwell, Savier and Edwards [15], Barron and Barret [1], Solymosi and Dompi [14], Jia [7] or Roszkowska [13]. From several ordering methods the following should be Method (ROC).…”