2015
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7612119279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking das prefeituras da região Sul do Brasil: uma avaliação a partir de critérios estabelecidos na Lei de Acesso à Informação

Abstract: A Lei de Acesso à Informação representa um passo fundamental rumo à consolidação da democracia brasileira. Entre seus preceitos, está a obrigação da disposição de informações na rede sobre a estrutura, funcionamento e prestação de contas dos órgãos/entidades da administração direta e indireta e de todos aqueles que recebem subvenção pública. Considerando sua relevância no contexto atual, este artigo busca, a partir de uma pesquisa mista, analisar como a referida lei está sendo implementada pelas prefeituras da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
19

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of broad analyses published on the operation of law 12.527 -especially in terms of passive transparency -represents a significant gap in our understanding of public administration in Brazil. Most extant works analyze active (website-based) transparency, and do so in one or a limited number of jurisdictions (Bairral, Silva and Alves, 2015;Bernardes, Santos and Rover, 2015;Cruz et al, 2012;Figueiredo and Gazoni, 2016; for an exception, see Lunkes et al, 2015;Matos et al, 2013;Souza et al, 2013;Staroscky et al, 2014). While the information governments publicize as active or open data transparency can be cherry-picked, 'sanitized' , or heavily mediated by officials (Michener and Bersch, 2013:239), passive transparency obliges officials to meet the unanticipated information demands of citizens within fixed timeframes.…”
Section: Da Opacidade à Transparência? Avaliando a Lei De Acesso à Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of broad analyses published on the operation of law 12.527 -especially in terms of passive transparency -represents a significant gap in our understanding of public administration in Brazil. Most extant works analyze active (website-based) transparency, and do so in one or a limited number of jurisdictions (Bairral, Silva and Alves, 2015;Bernardes, Santos and Rover, 2015;Cruz et al, 2012;Figueiredo and Gazoni, 2016; for an exception, see Lunkes et al, 2015;Matos et al, 2013;Souza et al, 2013;Staroscky et al, 2014). While the information governments publicize as active or open data transparency can be cherry-picked, 'sanitized' , or heavily mediated by officials (Michener and Bersch, 2013:239), passive transparency obliges officials to meet the unanticipated information demands of citizens within fixed timeframes.…”
Section: Da Opacidade à Transparência? Avaliando a Lei De Acesso à Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 115 ATI laws around the world, the authoritative Right-to-Information Rating (RTI-Rating) now ranks Brazil's as the 22 nd strongest -on paper. 2 The basis for Brazil's ATI law resides not only in the constitution (especially article 5 [XXXIII]), but in laws enacted throughout the 1990s and 2000s, such as those on Administrative Improbity, the Fiscal Responsibility Law, and the "Clean Slate Law" (Ficha Limpa), among others (Bernardes, Santos and Rover, 2015).…”
Section: Background On Law 12527/2011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na literatura, é possível encontrar diferentes trabalhos nos quais os autores avaliam o efeito desta lei no processo democrático. Em Bernardes, Santos e Rover [3], por exemplo, os autores fizeram uma análise de como a lei está sendo implementada pelas prefeituras da região Sul tendo em vista o cumprimento das disposições nela estabelecidas. São diversos os serviços disponibilizados sejam na esfera federal, estadual ou municipal.…”
Section: Iniciativas E Recursosunclassified
“…The Brazilian Freedom of Information Act was published on November 18, 2011, but only came into force 180 days later on May 16, 2012. Since then, many works have been developed to investigate the effectiveness of the law (LUCENA et al, 2014;RAUPP;PINHO, 2014;BERNARDES;SANTOS;ROVER, 2015;RAUPP;PINHO, 2015;COMIN et al, 2016;CRUZ;SILVA;SPINELLI, 2016;ROSA et al, 2016;ANDRADE;VIEIRA;BIANCHI;KRONBAUER, 2017). Most of these works show low effectiveness of the law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%