2012
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.137737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and Robust Resampling-Based Multiple-Testing Correction with Application in a Genome-Wide Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Study

Abstract: Genome-wide expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies have emerged as a powerful tool to understand the genetic basis of gene expression and complex traits. In a typical eQTL study, the huge number of genetic markers and expression traits and their complicated correlations present a challenging multiple-testing correction problem. The resampling-based test using permutation or bootstrap procedures is a standard approach to address the multiple-testing problem in eQTL studies. A brute force application … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mitigate this computational burden, software has been developed such as Matrix eQTL to efficiently test the associations by modeling the effect of genotype as either additive linear (least squares model) or categorical (ANOVA model) (Shabalin 2012). Because of the large number of tests performed, it is important to correct for multiple-testing by calculating the false discovery rate (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995; Yekutieli and Benjamini 1999) or resampling using bootstrap or permutation procedures (Karlsson 2006; Zhang et al 2012). …”
Section: Transcriptome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this computational burden, software has been developed such as Matrix eQTL to efficiently test the associations by modeling the effect of genotype as either additive linear (least squares model) or categorical (ANOVA model) (Shabalin 2012). Because of the large number of tests performed, it is important to correct for multiple-testing by calculating the false discovery rate (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995; Yekutieli and Benjamini 1999) or resampling using bootstrap or permutation procedures (Karlsson 2006; Zhang et al 2012). …”
Section: Transcriptome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of correlated SNPs, some methods correct for multiple testing via analysis of the underlying linkage disequilibrium structure of the genetic data . Johnson et al, Zhang et al, and Li et al provide some simulations comparing the performance of different methods …”
Section: Statistical Issues Related To Biobank Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[178][179][180] In the context of correlated SNPs, some methods correct for multiple testing via analysis of the underlying linkage disequilibrium structure of the genetic data. 181 174,182,183 An emerging challenge is the correction of multiple testing across the medical phenome x genome twodimensional landscape. With recent work regarding phenotype risk scores, there is increasing interest in studying phenotype-phenotype associations across the phenome.…”
Section: Multiple Testing Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that our approach is only one of potentially many and that the threshold estimates may be imperfect in the context of available techniques. As new approaches that are more computationally efficient (e.g., Zhang et al 2012) and applicable to the current data set become available, thresholds computed here may be revisited.…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that our approach is only one of potentially many and that the threshold estimates may be imperfect in the context of available techniques. As new approaches that are more computationally efficient (e.g., Zhang et al 2012) and applicable to the current data set become available, thresholds computed here may be revisited.Due to our more complex breeding history (G 4 as opposed to F 2 ), some adjustment of the LOD threshold is warranted (Valdar et al 2009). The subpopulation utilized here (n = 248) was composed of 54 unique families with an average of four individuals representing each family (median = 4; minimum = 1; maximum = 11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%