2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid assessment of regional and global left ventricular function using three-dimensional k-t BLAST imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows that the 3D measurements have greater inter‐ and intraobserver variability than the 2D measurements except the interobserver variability for LVEDV and correspondingly LVEF. The limits of agreement and the systematic deviation for LV function measurements with our proposed technique presented in Tables 1 and 2 are comparable to the results from the literature (2, 4, 5). The differences in our LV functional measurements are therefore not clinically relevant, but further validation on a larger set of subjects is desirable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 shows that the 3D measurements have greater inter‐ and intraobserver variability than the 2D measurements except the interobserver variability for LVEDV and correspondingly LVEF. The limits of agreement and the systematic deviation for LV function measurements with our proposed technique presented in Tables 1 and 2 are comparable to the results from the literature (2, 4, 5). The differences in our LV functional measurements are therefore not clinically relevant, but further validation on a larger set of subjects is desirable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This approach is sensitive to misregistration errors between slices because of variations in breathholding positions, though it benefits from the inflow enhancement effect (1). Recent advances in accelerated acquisition strategies allow single breathhold whole heart cardiac exams with superior SNR and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) using three‐dimensional (3D) imaging research sequences (2–5). However, the limited duration of a single breathhold requires compromises in spatial resolution, temporal resolution, volume coverage, and image quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the partition encoding direction of the 3D spiral dynamic scan can be accelerated with combinations of partial Fourier acceleration and through-time non-Cartesian GRAPPA [38,39] to shorten the breathhold, increase partition encoding resolution or expand the volumetric coverage. In the end, conservative scan and reconstruction parameters were selected for both methods at the expense of scan efficiency, where multiple slices with R = 2 [12], one slice with R = 1 [14,22] and one slice with R = 2 (as used in this study) per breathhold all yield high quality images against which ventricular functional parameters and image quality of a test method can be compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breathhold for the dynamic scan for 3D k-t BLAST was reduced to an average of 15 s (plus an additional breathhold of 7-14 s for training data) by increasing acceleration to R = 6 and encoding data with in-plane resolution near 3 × 3 mm 2 followed by spatial interpolation [12]. Lower blood-myocardium contrast from reduced in-flow enhancement for 3D cine cardiac imaging [13] was improved for 3D k-t BLAST with the use of a contrast agent [14]; this study acquired dynamic data with a resolution of 2.4 × 2.4 × 10-12 mm 3 and then interpolated to 1.2 × 1.2 × 5-6 mm 3 . However, Bland-Altman analysis of systolic LV functional parameters still showed significant differences with a 2D cine standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, improved CS methods for maintaining both reasonable spatial and temporal quality of dynamic MR data at higher reduction factors are very desirable. Several extensions and improvements of k‐t‐BLAST/k‐t SENSE and CS techniques have been recently proposed (20–28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%