2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.01035.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Detection of Mycosphaerella graminicola in Wheat Using Reverse Transcription‐PCR Assay

Abstract: Mycosphaerella graminicola is a prevalent and economically important fungal pathogen in wheat. Presymptomatic and accurate detection of viable pathogen structures in infected host plants is desirable for determining latent periods of epidemics and for timely fungicide application. A reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was used to detect and identify M. graminicola in wheat with the specific primer set E1/STSP2R. One single fragment was amplified only from total RNA of M. graminicola … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primers amplified similar-sized fragments from fungus culture grown in vitro and wheat leaves inoculated with M. graminicola . This primer pairs allowed a reliable DNA quantification at concentrations as low as 50 fg, which is very sensitive, as reported by other researchers [12,14,15]. Real-time PCR was found to be more sensitive than the standard amplification procedure, and a successful amplification was obtained with M. graminicola DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The primers amplified similar-sized fragments from fungus culture grown in vitro and wheat leaves inoculated with M. graminicola . This primer pairs allowed a reliable DNA quantification at concentrations as low as 50 fg, which is very sensitive, as reported by other researchers [12,14,15]. Real-time PCR was found to be more sensitive than the standard amplification procedure, and a successful amplification was obtained with M. graminicola DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A well tested toolbox of methods is now in place for studying the M. graminicola –wheat interaction. The fungus can be detected and measured in infected leaves and seeds by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Bearchell et al ., 2005; Consolo et al ., 2009; Guo et al ., 2006; Shetty et al ., 2007), which has been used to great effect in studying historical wheat samples in the Rothamsted Research Broadbank archive from 1844 to 2003 (Bearchell et al ., 2005). The study of the interaction has been aided by the use of young plants, requiring a short growth time and no vernalization, and by the use of both attached and detached leaf assays (Arraiano et al ., 2001a; Keon et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain was identified by PCR using the species‐specific primers (Guo et al., 2006) and by morphological characters. Conidia were generated on malt‐yeast agar plates (Guo et al., 2005) at 22°C in light for 5 days. A conidial suspension was prepared and adjusted to 10 5 conidia/ml with sterile deionized water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fungicide effect was assessed for two times on 17 May (GS39) and 14 June (GS65). At each time, 30 leaves were randomly sampled from each leaf layer (from leaf 1 (flag leaf) to 5) and the disease severity was scored on a disease scale of 0–5 (scale 1: 1–10% necrotic area of total leaf area; 2: 11–20%; 3: 21–30%; 4: 31–40%, 5: more than 40%) as described previously (Guo et al., 2005). Meanwhile, the pycnidia on each leaf were counted under a light microscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%