1954
DOI: 10.1021/ac60090a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Determination of Nitrates and Nitrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall per cent accuracy has been 2.8 ± 0.5 (n=20), and precision as estimated from values of coefficient of variation as 3.0 ± 0.5 for four sets of experiments. Per cent recovery with different extraction procedures have ranged from 85 to 112 (Green et al, 1982;Guevara et al, 1998;Lewis, 1951;Nelson et al, 1954). Reagent blanks did not show any background coloration indicating the reagents were free of any detectable nitrite/nitrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall per cent accuracy has been 2.8 ± 0.5 (n=20), and precision as estimated from values of coefficient of variation as 3.0 ± 0.5 for four sets of experiments. Per cent recovery with different extraction procedures have ranged from 85 to 112 (Green et al, 1982;Guevara et al, 1998;Lewis, 1951;Nelson et al, 1954). Reagent blanks did not show any background coloration indicating the reagents were free of any detectable nitrite/nitrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water blank and standard nitrate solutions, 1 and 3 ppm as N, were subjected to identical treatments. The extracts from selected samples including soil, carrot, morning-glory, and feed were simultaneously assayed for nitrate by modified (Mir, 2007) metal reduction technique (Nelson et al, 1954).The modifications included: a) substituting sulfanilic acid with a more stable aromatic amine, sulfanilamide, b) substituting 1-naphthylamine with a widely employed safer coupling agent NEDA, c) separately adding coupling agent to avoid adsorption of the azo-dye by the filter paper, and d) using optimized mass of zinc in the reduction powder to curtail furthering of reduction process by the metal (Mir, 2007). Urea-treated sample extracts were each added 9 mL of acetic acid solution, and a scoopful, ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The total concentration of the mineral elements was determined after destruction of a soil sample with aqua regia and subsequent dilution with water: K and Na by flame emission photometry; Ca, Mg, Fe and Mn by atomic absorption spectrophotometry; PO4-P colorimetrically following Chen et al (1956). The concentration of available NO3-N was determined by means of a modified method following Nelson et al (1954) and Woolley et al (1960), both in the actual situation and after 4 weeks incubation of fresh soil in a closed plastic bag at 28 °C, The concentration of available PO4-P was determined as described above after shaking a soil sample for I h with calcium lactate (1976) or water (1977). The amount of exchangeable cations was measured as described above after shaking a soil sample for 1 h with ammonium acetate (or water in the case of Fe).…”
Section: Soil Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%