Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Underwater Networks - WuWNet '07 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1287812.1287832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-range for an FH-FSK acoustic modem

Abstract: Signals transmitted through underwater channels experience attenuation due to dissipation of acoustic energy by spreading as well as by absorption. The path loss due to absorption is found to be highly dependent upon the frequency. Ambient noise, which also greatly affects accurate reception of the signal, is also highly dependent upon frequency. For these reasons, the received SNR cannot be assumed to be constant over wideband acoustic signaling schemes. In this paper we determine the (signaling) rate vs. ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The allocation of frequencies in FH-FSK which is taken from [6] is very similar to the representation in [2]. In the M FH hops one of two possible frequencies f m FH ,0 or f m FH ,1 is transmitted, where 0 ≤ m FH ≤ M FH − 1.…”
Section: Fh-fsk a Fh-fsk Frequency Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The allocation of frequencies in FH-FSK which is taken from [6] is very similar to the representation in [2]. In the M FH hops one of two possible frequencies f m FH ,0 or f m FH ,1 is transmitted, where 0 ≤ m FH ≤ M FH − 1.…”
Section: Fh-fsk a Fh-fsk Frequency Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In underwater acoustic communication, FH-FSK [1], [2] is often used as a modulation scheme, due to its simplicity of transmitter and receiver implementation, as well as its robustness to multipath propagation in the rough underwater acoustic channel. A disadvantage of FH-FSK is the low bandwidth efficiency, since the hops are only reused after the so-called channel clearing time and two frequencies are allocated per hop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spreading factor ≈ 1.5 is often considered to be a suitable choice [13] in empirical channel models without multipath propagation modeling. However, with multipath propagation every arrival can be assumed to underlie spherical spreading loss ( = 2) individually.…”
Section: B Spreading Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the transmitter power appears to be a good control of error rates in the channel but the trade-off with the energy consumption will be an issue. Changing frequency bands in response to changing channel conditions can also improve performance as was shown for FSK working at longer ranges by Parrish [30] but a tradeoff with complexity of hardware and software in the acoustic transducer will need to be considered. There are minor changes in range for error free transmission with increases in depth but temperature changes can change the error free range by up to 25 m. It is clear to see at the bit level the range dependency on frequency, wind, and the various absorption coefficient parameters for short range underwater acoustic communication systems.…”
Section: B Rate-rangementioning
confidence: 99%