1963
DOI: 10.2307/1055197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of Return on Municipal Subsidies to Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The payoff to attracting a relocating firm is potentially very high. Studies of Southern economic development programs, conducted over a decade ago, found that industrial subsidy programs yield benefit cost ratios far exceeding one, under a wide variety of conditions (Rhinehart, 1963;Rhinehart and Laird, 1972).…”
Section: Can Tax Incentives Influence the Firm Location Decision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The payoff to attracting a relocating firm is potentially very high. Studies of Southern economic development programs, conducted over a decade ago, found that industrial subsidy programs yield benefit cost ratios far exceeding one, under a wide variety of conditions (Rhinehart, 1963;Rhinehart and Laird, 1972).…”
Section: Can Tax Incentives Influence the Firm Location Decision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, some evaluators have counted all businesses assisted and all jobs associated with those businesses as programme benefits (e.g. RINEHART, 1963;SIDOR, 1991). However, if a firm would have made the same investment decision without the subsidy, then the public funds were substituted for private investment dollars.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Existing Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs include lost tax revenue, increased service demands, added pollution or congestion, the opportunity cost of alternative investments, the loss of new jobs to commuters, and the loss of jobs to local residents who previously commuted out (Cornia, Testa, and Stocker 1978;Rinehart 1963). The generally accepted benefits include increased employment, ultimate gain in property tax revenues, encouraged business expansion in non-abated areas, and greater demand for the services and products of existing firms.…”
Section: The Efficiency Of Tax Abatementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally accepted benefits include increased employment, ultimate gain in property tax revenues, encouraged business expansion in non-abated areas, and greater demand for the services and products of existing firms. Rinehart (1963) calculated the cost of attracting an industrial plant and the benefit of increased employment for twenty-two subsidized firms in ten southern communities. Costs include lost tax revenue, increased service demands, added pollution or congestion, the opportunity cost of alternative investments, the loss of new jobs to commuters, and the loss of jobs to local residents who previously commuted out (Cornia, Testa, and Stocker 1978;Rinehart 1963).…”
Section: The Efficiency Of Tax Abatementsmentioning
confidence: 99%