2014
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/65687/2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raw vs extruded coloured-flower pea as an ingredient in broiler diets: effects on performance, ileal digestibility, gut morphology, and intestinal microbiota activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the form of pea seeds (raw or extruded) had a negligible effect on the morphology of the ileum and distal colon. Similar results were observed previously [53] and indicated that pea seeds (raw or extruded) had no effect on the epithelium of chickens’ intestine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the form of pea seeds (raw or extruded) had a negligible effect on the morphology of the ileum and distal colon. Similar results were observed previously [53] and indicated that pea seeds (raw or extruded) had no effect on the epithelium of chickens’ intestine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The high tannin content (7.26–12.11 g/kg) in peas may decrease the digestibility of protein and metabolizable energy in rats and chickens [52]. In the present study, thermal process did not change their content but it is suggested that modern cultivars of peas, such as Milwa with a low tannin content (0.96–1.10 g/kg), can be accepted in feeds for broilers [53]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The major antinutritional factors in peas are tannins and trypsin inhibitors (Smulikowska et al, 2001;Konieczka et al, 2014). Several researchers report that tannins can negatively influence nutrient digestibility by their ability to form complexes with proteins (Griffiths and Moseley, 1980;Gdala et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers report that tannins can negatively influence nutrient digestibility by their ability to form complexes with proteins (Griffiths and Moseley, 1980;Gdala et al, 1992). The other commonly recognized antinutritional substances occurring in pea seeds include trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors (Konieczka et al, 2014), which significantly reduce the activity of enzymes responsible for protein digestion and, as a consequence, result in deterioration of production results (Gatel and Grosjean, 1990). Two subspecies of pea are cultivated in Poland: P. sativum hortense, which is white-flowered, and P. sativum arvense, which has coloured flowers (pink, red, or purple).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the utilisation of peas in diets for young growing monogastrics reveals; however, research on the extent to which peas can replace SBM in these diets is limited [ 2 ]. It has been shown that partial substitution of dietary SBM with a high amount of raw peas (200–500 g/kg) may have a negative impact on broiler chicken performance [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. This is primarily because of the action of secondary metabolites occurring naturally in the whole seeds (collectively referred to as anti-nutritional factors, ANF) or, as concluded by Nalle et al [ 10 ], due to the lack of careful consideration given to the protein and AA digestibility differences in feed formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%