Dear Editor:A 77-year-old female with numerous medical comorbidities (predominantly cardiac and respiratory) was referred by her general practitioner to the colorectal outpatient clinic at Fremantle Hospital with a symptomatic full-thickness rectal prolapse. The patient had a Hartmann's procedure performed approximately 35 years prior at a peripheral hospital after an obstetric injury rendered her completely incontinent of faeces. At that time, attempts at sphincter repair unfortunately failed and, consequently, the Hartmann's procedure was performed as a last resort. This procedure had been performed purely for symptomatic relief of her socially debilitating incontinence and no colonic pathology was identified clinically or pathologically.The patient stated that she first noticed prolapse of her rectal stump approximately 5 years prior to her referral to see us in colorectal clinic. At that time, her then general practitioner felt that her medical comorbidities excluded her from having any surgical intervention and, consequently, no referral had been made for specialist review.Examination of the patient's perineum confirmed the presence of a full-thickness rectal stump prolapse, with 15 cm of rectum prolapsing through the patient's anus. Examination of the anus established that the patient had no sphincter tone. Interestingly, a large mass (up to 35-mm diameter) emanating from the rectal mucosa was identified in the distal end of the prolapsing rectal stump-this was clinically suspicious for malignancy. Biopsies of the mass taken in the clinic confirmed the presence of adenocarcinoma.Preoperative staging computer tomography (CT) scanning confirmed that the entire rectal stump had prolapsed from the anus. No disseminated disease or suspicious lymphadenopathy was identified on this CT.Given the patient's numerous medical comorbidities-and subsequent discussions with anaesthetics-a collaborative decision was made to resect the patient's pathology via a perineal approach and avoid any abdominal incisions. This was deemed to be the safest approach given her medical fragility. Consequently, an intersphincteric perineal proctectomy was performed with high ligation of the mesorectum achieved with the use of an energy device through the perineum. The use of the energy device facilitated for a greater lymph node yield with more complete resection of the mesorectum and rectal vessels.The patient recovered well following this novel approach to her highly unusual pathology and no short-term complications were noted at 30 days. The pathology of the resection specimen confirmed the complete resection of a moderately differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma with invasion into the muscularis propria (pT2) and none of the 12 lymph nodes in the specimen involved (pN0).A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE databases looking for previous cases of colorectal adenocarcinomas in full-thickness rectal prolapse. Only five other cases exist of sigmoid and rectal adenocarcinomas detected in a full-thickness rectal prolapse...