2013
DOI: 10.7755/fb.111.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of fishes to two underwater survey tools, a manned submersible and a remotely operated vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In two species (rougheye rockfish, Sebastes aleutianus and shortraker rockfish, S. borealis) a different response was observed depending if the fish was first observed off the seafloor (diving response) or on the seafloor (no response). Similarly, Laidig et al (2013) found that reactions to both manned submersibles and remotely operated vehicles could vary by species, with species that tended to aggregate in the water column having a much stronger reaction to an underwater vehicle than species that were always found near the seafloor. Many other researchers have recorded different reactions to underwater visual platforms by different sizes and species of fish (Lauth et al, 2004;Adams et al, 1995;Trenkel et al, 2004;Stoner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two species (rougheye rockfish, Sebastes aleutianus and shortraker rockfish, S. borealis) a different response was observed depending if the fish was first observed off the seafloor (diving response) or on the seafloor (no response). Similarly, Laidig et al (2013) found that reactions to both manned submersibles and remotely operated vehicles could vary by species, with species that tended to aggregate in the water column having a much stronger reaction to an underwater vehicle than species that were always found near the seafloor. Many other researchers have recorded different reactions to underwater visual platforms by different sizes and species of fish (Lauth et al, 2004;Adams et al, 1995;Trenkel et al, 2004;Stoner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More recently, underwater imagery has been used in combination with other methods such as acoustics to estimate population abundance of difficult to assess species (Demer et al, 2009;Ressler et al, 2009;Rooper et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2012). To a large degree, all of these applications of underwater visual observations depend on unbiased platforms, including diving to the seafloor, changing the speed or direction of swimming, following the platform, or limited reaction to the platform (Pearcy et al, 1989;Hixon et al, 1991;Krieger and Ito, 1999;Lauth et al, 2004;Lorance and Trenkel, 2006;Laidig et al, 2013), indicating there could be potential biases in abundance estimates associated with fish reactions to the observation platforms during visual surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…no avoidance or attraction). Laidig et al (2013) reported that 6 and 10% of S. rosaceus near (total n = 134) and on (n = 10) . Both species moved an average distance of 2 to 3 m per reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all survey methods, there are several assumptions and sources of uncertainty associated with visual surveys. We have critically evaluated several of these assumptions using similar survey techniques in prior field surveys , Laidig et al 2013. The strip transect method used in our study assumes 100% detection of the target species within the strip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual survey methods, including divers and underwater vehicles, are nonlethal and can collect both habitat information and species information (Yoklavich et al 2000(Yoklavich et al , 2007. However biological information is difficult to collect with visual survey methods, and behavioral responses to cameras, divers, and vehicles might bias survey results (Stoner et al 2008;Laidig et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%