2014
DOI: 10.1086/677563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Fictional Stories and Winning Delayed Prizes: The Surprising Emotional Impact of Distant Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, our findings suggest that consumers do not simply rely relatively more on affective information (versus cognitive information) when making immediate judgments because affect has greater perceived information value. Instead, drawing on research showing systematic mispredictions in affective forecasting (e.g., Buechel et al, 2014; Ebert & Meyvis, 2014), our findings suggest that affective information captures a larger share of consumers' limited attentional resources when making immediate judgments, but less attentional resources when consumers are removed in time from the experience. Indeed, we show that when attention is once again drawn to affective information when consumers are making retrospective evaluations, they once again rely relatively more on this information.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, our findings suggest that consumers do not simply rely relatively more on affective information (versus cognitive information) when making immediate judgments because affect has greater perceived information value. Instead, drawing on research showing systematic mispredictions in affective forecasting (e.g., Buechel et al, 2014; Ebert & Meyvis, 2014), our findings suggest that affective information captures a larger share of consumers' limited attentional resources when making immediate judgments, but less attentional resources when consumers are removed in time from the experience. Indeed, we show that when attention is once again drawn to affective information when consumers are making retrospective evaluations, they once again rely relatively more on this information.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This prediction is consistent with recent research in affective forecasting, which has shown that forecasters (who are more removed from the actual hedonic experience) tend to mispredict affective evaluations of an experience because they incorporate cognitive information that experiencers ignore. For instance, Ebert and Meyvis (2014) examined how information regarding the temporal distance of a hedonic experience (e.g., reading a sad story about an event from the recent or distant past) influenced forecasted versus actual evaluations of emotional intensity. They showed that while forecasters' evaluations of emotional intensity were influenced by the more cognitive distance information, experiencers' evaluations were not.…”
Section: The Influence Of Cognitive and Affective Inputs Across Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…People do not always overestimate in predicting and remembering emotion, however. Recent research reveals underestimation [26][27][28], and accuracy [12,29,30], as well as overestimation [31][32][33]. To account for this variation, Buechel, Zhang, and Morewedge [26] proposed that emotional experiences are more attention absorbing and richly detailed than forecasts.…”
Section: Similar Sources and Patterns Of Bias When Predicting And Remmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, this study also extends Henkel's () findings by showing that not only does picture taking impair memory for photographed items, but it also reduces enjoyment of otherwise highly enjoyable experiences. Interestingly, although some prior work has found that interruptions may increase enjoyment by reducing hedonic adaptation (Nelson, Meyvis, & Galak, , but see Ebert & Meyvis, ), and although one could classify photography as an interruption of sorts, the results suggest that the distraction caused by taking pictures results in a net loss of enjoyment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%