Real fake? Appropriating mobility via Schengen visa in the context of biometric border controls

Scheel, Stephan

doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1401513

Cited by 41 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An expanding strand of research has been focusing on the ways in which migration and border control are put into practice (Dörrembäker & Mastenbroek 2017;Ellerman 2009;Eule et al 2017;Jordan et al 2003). In the case of visa policy, the day-to-day implementation has been analysed both from the point of view of visa applicants (Jileva 2007;Gaibazzi 2014) and state actors (Satzewich 2015;Scheel 2017;Zampagni 2013). However, this body of works have focused on visa policy implementation of one specific country or compared the same country in two different local contexts (Alpes and Spire 2014).…”

Section: A Comparative Implementation Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does policy change at the street level? Local knowledge, a community of practice and EU visa policy implementation in Morocco

Infantino

2019

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

She holds a PhD in political and social sciences from the Université Libre de Bruxelles and a PhD in political science, comparative political sociology, from Sciences Po Paris. Her research focuses on migration and border control in practice. She analyses actors and organizations that put control into action by paying particular attention to the circulation of knowledge across levels of policy-making, transnational actors and transnational dynamics of policy change, the involvement of non-state actors in the functions of governments. She has recently published the book 'Schengen Visa Implementation and Transnational Policymaking', Palgrave Macmillan. She is also the author of the book 'Outsourcing Border Control. Politics and Practice of Contracted Visa Policy in Morocco', Palgrave MacMillan, the co-editor of the 2014 Security Dialogue's special issue 'Border Security as Practice' and the author of several articles about the day-today filtering work of borders that is achieved via visa issuing.

show abstract

Section: A Comparative Implementation Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does policy change at the street level? Local knowledge, a community of practice and EU visa policy implementation in Morocco

Infantino

2019

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples include the E.U. Visa Information System (VIS) (Scheel ) and the development of biometric entry–exit systems in the E.U. and other regions (for the E.U., see Sontowski :2736).…”

Section: A New Level Of Restrictive Bordering Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward Fortress Capitalism: The Restrictive Transformation of Migration and Border Regimes as a Reaction to the Capitalist Multicrisis

Georgi

2019

Canadian Review of Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article develops the concept of "fortress capitalism." The concept has two dimensions. First, it describes those elements within today's migration and border regimes that aim to control the mobility of the global working class in repressive ways. Second, it designates a dystopian future scenario, in which these repressive elements have massively expanded. Such a formation might develop as part of a twenty-first-century fascism. Based on historical materialism and critical theory, the article makes four points. First, it asserts that migration regimes are being transformed toward a new level of restrictiveness. Second, it argues that fortress capitalism complements theoretical motives that emphasize the uncontrollability of migration. Third, it contends that migration and border regimes in their emergence, dynamics, forms, and effects are closely linked to the intersectional dynamics of global capitalism as a whole. Fourth, it points out that global capitalism fundamentally depends on border regimes to regulate its contradictions. RésuméCet articleélabore le concept de « capitalisme forteresse ». Ce concept comporte deux volets. Premièrement, il décrit leséléments de la migration et des régimes frontaliers actuels visantà contrôler la mobilité de la classe ouvrière mondiale de façon répressive. Deuxièmement, il For helpful comments to this article, including earlier drafts, I am grateful to Lars Bretthauer, Joshua Hatton, Manjiri Palicha, Vishwas Satgar, Simon Noori, Stephan Scheel as well as two anonymous reviewers whose feedback was extremely helpful.

show abstract

“…Issues of understanding, legal regulation and counteraction to the negative manifestations of migration processes are placed high in modern humanitarian studies, both in Russia and other countries. Various aspects of this issues are of interest to economists (Djajić, Vinogradova, 2019), sociologists (Kim, 2019;Beck, et al, 2019;Nakache, 2018), political scientists (Rodríguez-Izquierdo, Darmody, 2017;Hoesch, 2017), and lawyers (Flores, Schachter, 2018;Markovska, Serdyuk, Sokurenko, 2019;Helbling, Leblang, 2019;Scheel, 2018;Bilger, 2018).…”

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsibility for Migration Offences under the Laws of Foreign Countries

Urda¹

2019

J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Humanit. soc. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Legislations of foreign countries on responsibility for committing offences in the field of illegal migration have been subjected to the comparative legal study. Its purpose is to identify the characteristics of criminalization and penalization of relevant offences in foreign countries and to offer proposals for improving the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation on their basis. In addition to the comparative legal method, formal legal, formal logical, dialectical and systematic methods are used in the paper. The result of the study was the creation of the author's classification of crimes in the sphere of illegal migration, which allowed the author to formulate priority areas for improving the existing mechanism of counteraction to illegal migration in the Russian Federation. Scope of regulation: lawmaking and education. Based on the study results, conclusions on the necessity to give criminal significance to the deportation of foreign citizens and stateless persons, as well as toughening the responsibility for organizing illegal migration of several persons or a person who are prohibited from entering the state, have been drawn up.

show abstract

Real fake? Appropriating mobility via Schengen visa in the context of biometric border controls

Cited by 41 publications

References 24 publications

How does policy change at the street level? Local knowledge, a community of practice and EU visa policy implementation in Morocco

How does policy change at the street level? Local knowledge, a community of practice and EU visa policy implementation in Morocco

Toward Fortress Capitalism: The Restrictive Transformation of Migration and Border Regimes as a Reaction to the Capitalist Multicrisis

Responsibility for Migration Offences under the Laws of Foreign Countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About