2016
DOI: 10.3354/meps11572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time species distribution models for conservation and management of natural resources in marine environments

Abstract: Species distribution models in marine environments typically use static variables, partly due to the limited availability of fine-resolution dynamic predictor variables and sufficiently detailed species abundance data. Our aim was to describe and quantify the dynamic coupling between the distribution of marine species (seabirds) and the natural variability of their habitat in real time through the combination of a high-resolution hydrodynamic model, aerial digital surveys and real-time species distribution mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when fineresolution dynamic predictor variables from high-resolution hydrodynamic models or remote sensing (Blondeau-Patissier et al 2014) are available together with sufficiently detailed information on species abundance, the dynamic coupling between the seabird distribution and the natural variability of their habitat can be modeled in (near) realtime. For example, dynamic species distribution models for red-throated divers Gavia stellata in the outer Thames estuary, United Kingdom, confirmed their tight association with frontal zones (Skov et al 2016).…”
Section: Sdms Of Seabird Distributions At Seamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, when fineresolution dynamic predictor variables from high-resolution hydrodynamic models or remote sensing (Blondeau-Patissier et al 2014) are available together with sufficiently detailed information on species abundance, the dynamic coupling between the seabird distribution and the natural variability of their habitat can be modeled in (near) realtime. For example, dynamic species distribution models for red-throated divers Gavia stellata in the outer Thames estuary, United Kingdom, confirmed their tight association with frontal zones (Skov et al 2016).…”
Section: Sdms Of Seabird Distributions At Seamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Habitat models have provided novel tools for assessing and predicting how animals interact with their environment and are increasingly used for ecological and conservation-relevant research (Barbet-Massin, Jiguet, Albert, & Thuiller, 2012;Buckley et al, 2010;Dambach & Rödder, 2011;Elith & Leathwick, 2009;Studwell et al, 2017;Zydelis et al, 2011). Most recently, marine SDMs have been used to identify critical habitat of understudied populations, improve our understanding of distributional shifts in habitat under changing ocean conditions, and support commercial and protected species management (Carvalho, Brito, Crespo, Watts, & Possingham, 2011;Eguchi, Benson, Foley, & Forney, 2017;Hazen et al, 2016;Hobday, Hartog, Spillman, Alves, & Hilborn, 2011;Hooker et al, 2011;Skov et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the ID process, the census information is transferred into standard data tables and used for the calculation of population densities at grid-cell or at survey-area level, and for geostatistical analyses related to habitat use (e.g. Skov et al, 2016) and potential displacement effects. Randomized samples of the photographic material containing classified georeferenced objects can be reciprocally quality controlled by external, independent reviewers.…”
Section: Species Identification (Id) and Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%