2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.6.014014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of a Binary-Outcome Projection Measurement of a Three-Level Superconducting Quantum System

Abstract: Binary-outcome measurements allow to determine whether a multi-level quantum system is in a certain state while preserving quantum coherence between all orthogonal states. In this paper, we explore different regimes of the dispersive readout of a three-level superconducting quantum system coupled to a microwave cavity in order to implement binary-outcome measurements. By designing identical cavity frequency shifts for the first and second excited states of the system, we realize strong projective binary-outcom… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For detailed information on the effect of the readout pulse on the state of a qutrit state for different detunings, including a theoretical model, experimental verification and calibration procedures, see (ref. 25 ). Probing the cavity for 350 ns, we reach a single-shot contrast of ≈ 96% between and , limited primarily by thermal excitation and decay of the qutrit state during the readouts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detailed information on the effect of the readout pulse on the state of a qutrit state for different detunings, including a theoretical model, experimental verification and calibration procedures, see (ref. 25 ). Probing the cavity for 350 ns, we reach a single-shot contrast of ≈ 96% between and , limited primarily by thermal excitation and decay of the qutrit state during the readouts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever a leaked qubit is measured, it will always return eigenvalue −1. Implicitly, this assumes two-level measurements that cannot distinguish between excited states, and is also relevant to many qubit architectures [26,38]. However, while this error-model is used in simulating logical error rates, we consider an even more damaging leakage model when accounting for fault-paths to argue about effective distance.…”
Section: Leakagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the resonator probes the averaged qubit state, defined by σ z , and changing the qubit state resulted in shifting the position of the resonant transmission. Alternatively, the measurements can be done with the single-shot readout [20,[40][41][42][43]. In this case, in each measurement, the resonator would see the qubit in either the ground or excited state, with σ z equal to −1 or 1, respectively [44].…”
Section: Thermometry With Pulsed Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%