2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rear Emitter Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells: Fewer Restrictions on the Optoelectrical Properties of Front Side TCOs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-circuit current can be consequently improved (because of reduced shading). Similar considerations have been made for heterojunction devices when comparing front and rear emitter configurations [20].…”
Section: Front Versus Rear Emitter Configurationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The short-circuit current can be consequently improved (because of reduced shading). Similar considerations have been made for heterojunction devices when comparing front and rear emitter configurations [20].…”
Section: Front Versus Rear Emitter Configurationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The detailed reasons for these high values are yet to be clarified; yet, possible explanations include high crystallinity, resulting in high doping efficiencies and hence improved contact and series resistance [52]. An additional possibility to be taken into account is the rear-side hole collection [70]. Comparing these results with the all-amorphous reference device fabricated in the same run clearly shows both the optical but also electrical benefits of μc-Si:H. However, to be fair, the reference we show here exhibits slightly lower performance (best cell: 716.7 mV, 36.7 mA/cm 2 , 77.3%, and 20.4%); yet, the lower V oc cannot account for a difference of >2% absolute in FF with respect to the best μc-Si:H device.…”
Section: (C) and (D)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design increased the short current density, Jsc, due to the more transparent and lower parasitic absorption nanocrystalline silicon n layer (nc-Si:H) used as a front surface field (FSF) compared to the amorphous silicon based (p) layer of the emitter. Moreover, this configuration allows for using less conductive TCOs due to the additional contribution of the ntype silicon wafer to lateral carrier transport [3]. Introducing optimized wet chemistry processes for random pyramid texturing, allowed a further improvement in Jsc due to an optimized and more homogeneous pyramid size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%