Most
craniofacial bones are derived from the ectodermal germ layer via neural crest stem cells, which are distinct from mesoderm-derived
long bones. However, current craniofacial bone tissue engineering
approaches do not account for this difference and utilize mesoderm-derived
bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) as a paradigm cell source.
The effect of the embryonic origin (ontogeny) of an MSC population
on its osteogenic differentiation potential and regenerative ability
still remains unresolved. To clarify the effects of MSC ontogeny on
bone regenerative ability, we directly compared the craniofacial bone
regenerative abilities of an ecto-mesenchymal stem cell (eMSC) population,
which is derived from human embryonic stem cells via a neural crest intermediate, with mesodermal adult BM-MSCs. eMSCs
showed comparable osteogenic and chondrogenic ability to BM-MSCs in
2-D in vitro culture, but lower adipogenic ability.
They exhibited greater proliferation than BM-MSCs and comparable construct
mineralization in a well-established 3-D polycaprolactone-tricalcium
phosphate (PCL-TCP) scaffold system in vitro. eMSC-derived
3D osteogenic constructs were maintained for longer in a proliferative
osteoblast state and exhibited differential levels of genes related
to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling compared to BM-MSCs. Although
both eMSC and BM-MSC-seeded scaffold constructs could promote bone
regeneration in a rat calvarial defect model, eMSC-derived osseous
constructs had significantly higher cellularity due to increased number
of proliferative (Ki67+) cells than those seeded with BM-MSCs,
and exhibited enhanced new bone formation in the defect area as compared
to untreated controls. Overall, our study demonstrates the potential
of human eMSCs for future clinical use in craniofacial regeneration
applications and indicates the importance of considering MSC origin
when selecting an MSC source for regenerative applications.