1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2539(08)60236-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Field Electron Microscopy of Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is fluctuation in the emission current due to the nonmetallic nature of the tip, field penetration and fluctuations of the applied potential shift the position of the emitting level, the other possibility is because of the structure of the cap, whereas it is well-known that small changes in adsorbate coverage result in large variations of the work function (Minoux et al, 2005), that could lead to observed saturation at high applied voltages and strong instabilities of the emission in some voltages ranges (Binh et al, 1996;Swanson & Bell, 1973), once the adsorbates removed, the emission current will be reduced because these adsorbates enhanced the field emission current of nanotube by two or three order (Dean & Chalamala, 2000) and the deviation from FN equations will disappear. The effect of relaxation process on field emission process from SWCNT could reduce the VSW as we observed in CNT-11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is fluctuation in the emission current due to the nonmetallic nature of the tip, field penetration and fluctuations of the applied potential shift the position of the emitting level, the other possibility is because of the structure of the cap, whereas it is well-known that small changes in adsorbate coverage result in large variations of the work function (Minoux et al, 2005), that could lead to observed saturation at high applied voltages and strong instabilities of the emission in some voltages ranges (Binh et al, 1996;Swanson & Bell, 1973), once the adsorbates removed, the emission current will be reduced because these adsorbates enhanced the field emission current of nanotube by two or three order (Dean & Chalamala, 2000) and the deviation from FN equations will disappear. The effect of relaxation process on field emission process from SWCNT could reduce the VSW as we observed in CNT-11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to the observed saturation at high applied voltages and strong instabilities of the emission in some voltages ranges. The difference in energy between emitted and replacement electrons provokes a tip heating or cooling (Nottingham effect), related to the position of the Fermi level (Swanson & Bell, 1973;Thien et al, 1996). On tubes with emitting states just above the Fermi level this reduces the increase of the temperature with the current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On tubes with emitting states just above the Fermi level this reduces the increase of the temperature with the current. As for the current steps, they most likely reflect changes in the surface structure (Swanson & Bell, 1973) and/or in the adsorbate coverage (adsorption, desorption or diffusion) ( Lee et al, 1995). The former possibility is unlikely because of the structure of the cap, whereas it is well known that small changes in adsorbate coverage result in large variations of the work function (Kyritsakis & Xanthakis, 2015;Lee et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This current density, J, is assumed to be due to field emitted electrons, described by the following equalion [19][20][21]:…”
Section: The Determination Of Ihe Mechanism Responsible For Initialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for the above expressions, the local elccu-on field E must be expressed in Volt/cm, the cathode work function, <?, in eV, and temperature T in K. Also note that as T-^0, equation 5 reduces to the Fowler-Nordheim equation [19][20][21] for electron field emission from a perfectly smooth surface. The criterion for the applicability of equation 5 is [19]:…”
Section: The Determination Of Ihe Mechanism Responsible For Initialmentioning
confidence: 99%