2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/293/1/012022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent improvements on the description of hadronic interactions in Geant4

Abstract: Abstract.We present an overview of recent improvements of hadronic models in Geant4 for the physics configurations (Physics Lists) relevant to applications in high energy experiments. During last year the improvements have concentrated on the study of unphysical discontinuities in calorimeter observables in the transition regions between the models used in Physics Lists. The microscopic origin of these have been investigated, and possible improvements of Geant4 code are currently under validation. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time when the CALICE test beam programme was proposed, there were significant uncertainties in the simulation of shower shapes, and the predictions for the radius, for example, varied between models by up to a factor of two (Mavromanolakis and Ward, 2004). In the meantime, following detailed comparisons with LHC test-beam data, major revisions of all stages of the simulation code have been undertaken (Apostolakis et al, 2010;Dotti et al, 2011) For example, the range of the string-based model has been extended towards lower energy, and in particular the diffraction based Fritiof model does not need any recursion to the old parameterised models to bridge the gap to the low energy cascade models. Also an experimental list was implemented, based on the chiral invariant phase space (CHIPS) model, which covers the full energy range, but is not finally tuned yet.…”
Section: A Shower Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time when the CALICE test beam programme was proposed, there were significant uncertainties in the simulation of shower shapes, and the predictions for the radius, for example, varied between models by up to a factor of two (Mavromanolakis and Ward, 2004). In the meantime, following detailed comparisons with LHC test-beam data, major revisions of all stages of the simulation code have been undertaken (Apostolakis et al, 2010;Dotti et al, 2011) For example, the range of the string-based model has been extended towards lower energy, and in particular the diffraction based Fritiof model does not need any recursion to the old parameterised models to bridge the gap to the low energy cascade models. Also an experimental list was implemented, based on the chiral invariant phase space (CHIPS) model, which covers the full energy range, but is not finally tuned yet.…”
Section: A Shower Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEANT4 implements various models for hadronic cascades, each covering a specific energy region. To provide a description of hadronic interactions over the full relevant energy range, several such models are grouped together into hadronic physics lists [15,18]. In this paper, three physics lists are used: QGSP_BERT, QGSP_BERT_HP and QBBC.…”
Section: Hadronic Cascade Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, given a point in space, the value of the magnetic field is obtained by interpolation from a regular grid of values [37]. As for the physics, we use the recommended reference physics list FTFP_BERT [38].…”
Section: A Real-world Particle Detector: Cmsmentioning
confidence: 99%