2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13131-018-1270-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent satellite-derived sea ice volume flux through the Fram Strait: 2011–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RSD of ice drift is 0.50 which is the largest contributor. Consistent with previous studies, such as Ricker et al (2018) and Bi et al (2018), the ice drift with maximal RSD is more likely to affect variations in sea ice volume flux.…”
Section: Cunninghamsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The RSD of ice drift is 0.50 which is the largest contributor. Consistent with previous studies, such as Ricker et al (2018) and Bi et al (2018), the ice drift with maximal RSD is more likely to affect variations in sea ice volume flux.…”
Section: Cunninghamsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the CMST data which assimilates CS2 and SMOS sea ice thickness and SSMIS sea ice concentration simultaneously have more advantages in calculating sea ice volume and extent export. Ricker et al (2018) and Bi et al (2018), gave their averaged freezing season volume export that are of 1711 km 3 and 1463 km 3 , respectively, based on the CS2 thickness data and different ice drift data over a similar period and outflow gates. Our average estimate of QEX,CMST,CMST (e.g., M2) based on the CMST ice thickness and drift is 1575 km 3 while the QEX, CMST, OSISAF (e.g., M1) derived from CMST thickness and OSI SAF drift is 1599 km 3 in the freezing season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, in 2007 anomalous wind conditions over the Arctic contributed to a strengthened transpolar drift and increased sea-ice export through the Fram Strait, reducing the amount of multi-year sea ice within the Arctic (Smedsrud et al 2011;Zhang et al 2008). However, Bi et al (2018) found a decrease in the sea-ice volume export of 600 km 3 /year in the period 2011-2014 compared to the periods 1990-1994 and 2003-2008. They attributed this decline first and foremost to changes in sea-ice drift, and to a lesser extent to changes in sea-ice thickness and even less to a decrease in the sea-ice concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%