2012
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.4.000947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocity-Enhanced Optical Communication Through Atmospheric Turbulence—Part I: Reciprocity Proofs and Far-Field Power Transfer Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more effective solution to this challenge is provided by the reciprocity of a single-mode link through the atmosphere. The atmosphere has been shown both theoretically [48][49][50][51] and through measurements of amplitude fluctuations [51,52] to be reciprocal for propagation times shorter than the coherence time of the turbulence. In Ref.…”
Section: Implications For Stability and Accuracy Of One-way Opticamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more effective solution to this challenge is provided by the reciprocity of a single-mode link through the atmosphere. The atmosphere has been shown both theoretically [48][49][50][51] and through measurements of amplitude fluctuations [51,52] to be reciprocal for propagation times shorter than the coherence time of the turbulence. In Ref.…”
Section: Implications For Stability and Accuracy Of One-way Opticamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d). This indicates that the coherence time of atmospheric turbulence lies in the millisecond range, as usually the case in normal air conditions 25 . The propagation delay of light traveling over our 18 km free-space link is 62.5 μs, much faster than the atmospheric coherence time, thereby permitting turbulent eddies to be assumed frozen in space 26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…the power fluctuation in forward and backward channels is the same for sufficiently small FSO terminals. More relaxed conditions were studied in [7]. It was confirmed by practical measurements and simulations that the correlation coefficient between both channels is still acceptably high even for separated transmitting and receiving lenses with different diameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%