2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognising blueberry fruit of different maturity using histogram oriented gradients and colour features in outdoor scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous fruit maturity classification research resulted in similar classification accuracies (melon with 85.7% [ 62 ], banana with 87.1% [ 30 ], passion fruit with 91.5% [ 27 ], blueberry with 94% [ 36 ], papaya with 94.3% [ 40 ], date with 96.9% [ 39 ], and tomato with 99.31% [ 34 ]). However, this comparison is very limited due to several reasons; most of these fruits have uniform maturity patterns; all research were based on a single and usually random viewpoint of the fruit, and each research used a different classification method that varies in the amount of data needed and its computational complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous fruit maturity classification research resulted in similar classification accuracies (melon with 85.7% [ 62 ], banana with 87.1% [ 30 ], passion fruit with 91.5% [ 27 ], blueberry with 94% [ 36 ], papaya with 94.3% [ 40 ], date with 96.9% [ 39 ], and tomato with 99.31% [ 34 ]). However, this comparison is very limited due to several reasons; most of these fruits have uniform maturity patterns; all research were based on a single and usually random viewpoint of the fruit, and each research used a different classification method that varies in the amount of data needed and its computational complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Image processing and machine vision for the maturity level classification of fruits have been intensively investigated [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Most work to date has focused on maturity analysis of fruit that ripen in a uniform fashion, such as tomato [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], passion fruit [ 27 ], apricot [ 24 ], persimmon [ 35 ], blueberry [ 36 , 37 ], cherry [ 38 ], and date [ 39 ]. Different methods were used for classification (e.g., support vector machines [ 27 , 36 ], convolutional neural networks [ 34 , 39 ], random forest [ 40 ], K-nearest neighbor [ 33 ], and linear discriminant analysis [ 35 ]) based on different sensors (e.g., RGB—Red Green Blue [ 29 , 33 , 35 , 36 ], RGB-D—Red Green Blue-Depth [ 27 ], and NIR—Near Infra-Red [ 38 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States is the world’s largest producer of blueberries [ 39 ]. More recently, Andalusia, Spain, has become an important producer and is at present the largest producer in Europe (51.569 tonnes in 2019) [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on image processing techniques, three fresh tomato maturity levels (green, orange and red) were identified by Wan et al [21], where the average blue-channel intensity and the hues of pixels in the maximum inscribed circle within each tomato’s surface were extracted and then classified with a backpropagation neural network; the average accuracy of the three maturity levels reached 99.31%. Tan et al [22] proposed a stepwise, computer vision-based algorithm to recognize the maturity stages of blueberries (mature, intermediate and young), and the recognition pipeline attained an average accuracy of 92.07%; specifically, the fruit regions were first located using histogram-oriented gradients and feature attributes in the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) L*a*b* color space, and then the maturity of a located blueberry was determined using template matching with a weighted Euclidean distance. Marimuthu et al [23] formulated a particle swarm optimized fuzzy model to grade banana fruits into unripe, ripe and overripe stages using peel color attributes extracted from the hue channel and opponent colors in CIE L*a*b* space, achieving an average classification accuracy of 93.11%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%