2013
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2013.797915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for the processing and storage of water samples before polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis

Abstract: A range of options for the storage and partial processing of water samples before polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis were evaluated. In addition, temporal storage of extracted DNA at 4 8C was investigated. Filtering the water sample and then storing that filter at (20 8C for up to six months before DNA extraction was equivalent to extracting DNA immediately. Freezing a water sample resulted in an immediate 1 log loss of PCR signal, although thereafter the sample was stable for at least three months. A ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Maruyama et al (2014) observed detectable concentrations of bluegill fish (Lepomis macrochirus) to decline by half in under 7 h at 20 o C. Even when unfiltered water is frozen at -20 o C, reductions of amplifiable DNA as great as ten-fold are reported in the literature (Cornelisen et al 2012). Therefore, it is preferable to filter samples as soon as possible after sampling, and to preserve the filtered material at low temperature; studies have shown filters (and associated DNA) can be stored at -20 o C for later DNA extraction without significant loss of amplifiable DNA (Gilpin et al 2013). Other research suggests the fixation of filtered DNA with ethanol may allow sample material to be preserved at room temperature for many days (Minamoto et al 2012;Thomsen et al 2012a;Minamoto et al 2016).…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Water and Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Maruyama et al (2014) observed detectable concentrations of bluegill fish (Lepomis macrochirus) to decline by half in under 7 h at 20 o C. Even when unfiltered water is frozen at -20 o C, reductions of amplifiable DNA as great as ten-fold are reported in the literature (Cornelisen et al 2012). Therefore, it is preferable to filter samples as soon as possible after sampling, and to preserve the filtered material at low temperature; studies have shown filters (and associated DNA) can be stored at -20 o C for later DNA extraction without significant loss of amplifiable DNA (Gilpin et al 2013). Other research suggests the fixation of filtered DNA with ethanol may allow sample material to be preserved at room temperature for many days (Minamoto et al 2012;Thomsen et al 2012a;Minamoto et al 2016).…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Water and Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filters were stored at -20°C in sterilised 50 mL plastic tubes until use. Extreme care was taken to avoid long storage periods and all groundwater filtrations and DNA extractions were carried out immediately as delays may alter the apparent microbial community composition in such samples (Gilpin et al 2013). Bacterial genomic DNA extractions were performed using ZR Fungal/ Bacterial DNA kits (Zymo Research, USA) as described in Sirisena et al (2013).…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filters were stored at -20 °C in sterilized 50-ml plastic tubes until use. Extreme care was taken to avoid long storage periods and all groundwater filtrations and DNA extractions were carried out immediately as delays may alter the apparent microbial community composition in such samples (Gilpin et al 2013). Bacterial genomic DNA extractions were performed using ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA kits (Zymo Research, United States) as described in .…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, 2 L of groundwater from each site was filtered through a sterile 0.22 µm nitrocellulose membrane filter (Millipore, Australia). The filtrations were carried out immediately as delays could alter the natural microbial community composition in these samples (Gilpin et al 2013). The PCR amplicon library preparation and 454 pyrosequencing.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and 454 Pyrosequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%