2017
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance

Abstract: We address inconsistent procedures and metrics used to evaluate photochemical model performance, recommend a specific set of statistical metrics, and develop updated quantitative performance benchmarks for those metrics. We promote quantitatively consistent evaluations across different applications, scales, models, inputs, and configurations, thereby (1) improving the user's ability to quantitatively place results in context and guide model improvements, and (2) better informing users, regulators, and stakehol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
284
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
30
284
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While daytime ozone statistics were fairly good domain wide and along the western coast of Lake Michigan, IOA 97.4% and 79.7%, respectively, ozone was biased low in the coastal west region (−4.4 ppb, or a normalized mean bias of −8.58%). This is within the ±15% criteria recommended in Emery et al (). But more importantly, peak ozone concentrations are underpredicted during the high ozone events on 2 June, 10–13 June, and 15–17 June 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While daytime ozone statistics were fairly good domain wide and along the western coast of Lake Michigan, IOA 97.4% and 79.7%, respectively, ozone was biased low in the coastal west region (−4.4 ppb, or a normalized mean bias of −8.58%). This is within the ±15% criteria recommended in Emery et al (). But more importantly, peak ozone concentrations are underpredicted during the high ozone events on 2 June, 10–13 June, and 15–17 June 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additional model performance statistics are provided in Table S1. Model performance generally met benchmarks proposed by Emery et al ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As shown in Figure , model predictions of indoor ammonium concentrations, obtained using Equation (), tend to be above the 1:1 line for ammonium concentrations lower than 1 μg/m 3 , and below the 1:1 line for ammonium concentrations higher than 1 μg/m 3 . The NMB is −42%, higher than the proposed criterion for 24‐hours average ammonium (±30%), as shown in Table . r is 0.68, higher than the proposed criterion of 0.4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The other parameter is the correlation coefficient ( r ) defined as:r=)(Pi-P¯)(Oi-O¯)(Pi-P¯2)(Oi-O¯2where P¯ and Q¯ are the mean values of model simulation and observation, respectively. Emery et al argued that a larger number of simulation‐observation pairs tends to result in better NMB. Correlation coefficient ( r ) is therefore needed to address variability over the entire range of the simulation‐observation pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation